Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js

Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 ... 10   Go Down

Author Topic: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker v2  (Read 54246 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Avimimus

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 210
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #48 on: January 04, 2010, 03:26:09 PM »

So, it looks like we need to delete the gondola (as many crews did in real life)
Logged

OLORIN

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #49 on: January 04, 2010, 04:07:54 PM »

And two MG-FF? :)
Logged

r4xm

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 101
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #50 on: January 04, 2010, 04:22:55 PM »

The more variants the better: with gondola, without gondola, with antennas, with Schraege Musik...... ::)
Logged

Ryan Chadwick

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #51 on: January 05, 2010, 09:25:41 AM »

Guys, look at Il2 Compare. You can see that the best performance Ju-88A-4 has at 5800m.
Ju-88C-6 has same engins and Vmax=480 km/h at 5800m - not so far from real life.

but this model will only get to that speed if you full dive at full throttle. level flight the max i can reach is 355 kph approx. the C-6 Can reach 303 mph (488 kph) bare in mind the C-6 Did have the same engines as the A-4 but she had modifications which helped it lose some weight.  ones i can think of;

3 crew members instead of 4,
1 less machine gun
Removal of Gondola (Unofficial optional Modification lower Weight )
Removal of Air Brakes
Removal of Bomb racks (Optional)
and also Removal of some Cockpit Equipment not needed (correct me if im wrong)

so these weight cuts must of made it faster..
Logged

r4xm

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 101
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #52 on: January 05, 2010, 11:18:13 AM »

As I know C-6 was about 500 kg lighter than A-4 and the max level flight speed was abt. 490 km/h. With antennas (nightfighter) it was abt. 450 km/h.

The maximum that I could reach at the game was 435 km/h (real speed) at abt. 6000 m. So we have abt. 50 km/h lesser than it should be.
Logged

Whiskey_Sierra_972

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6743
  • In memory of my beloved hero: Saburo SAKAI!
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #53 on: January 05, 2010, 12:58:00 PM »

Hi mate!

Some time is past so I ask if there are any news about give a more fighter bomber issue at plane behavior?

It still have too much trouble with ground target!!

cheers

walter
Logged

OLORIN

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #54 on: January 06, 2010, 04:02:35 AM »

r4xm, you need a screenshot to belive in 480 km/h on 5850m?  :)
Logged

OberstDanjeje

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1392
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #55 on: January 06, 2010, 04:09:39 AM »

The speed could depend on the map, try Smolensk, true air speed 488 km/h at 5900/6000 m
Logged

r4xm

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 101
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #56 on: January 06, 2010, 04:22:52 AM »

r4xm, you need a screenshot to belive in 480 km/h on 5850m?  :)


Hi,

I've tried on the Moscow winter map. She had 50% fuel oil, and I've used the automat for horizontal flight. In this conditions the maximum speed was 435 km/h (true air speed).
Logged

WEASELWAGON

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #57 on: January 06, 2010, 08:01:07 AM »

whats going on with the antenna's for this?
Logged

Avimimus

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 210
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #58 on: January 06, 2010, 09:35:34 AM »

And two MG-FF? :)

I believe it was only one ;)
Logged

OberstDanjeje

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1392
Re: Ju 88 C-6 Daywalker
« Reply #59 on: January 06, 2010, 11:53:59 AM »

Winter map mean slow speed
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 ... 10   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 20 queries.