Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js

Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 17   Go Down

Author Topic: FX_revolution  (Read 68742 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Aed

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
  • FX_revolutioner
FX_revolution
« on: March 20, 2010, 06:03:05 AM »

FX_revolution rellise
http://bastards.ucoz.com/FX_Revolution_20100929_1.0.rar

Il2_GunCamtest

Brand new FX in IL! =)))

a few words about ..
1. smoke fire
2. Possibility of burning fuel in the air (dm untouched) .. therefore particularly anything does not affect ... Is that induces panic =)
3. Ignition engine separate .. oil too
4. on the ground fires .. rubble
5. fires terrestrial technology ..
6. train explosion .. Now the detonation of the chain is unlikely ...
7. Own TougherTrains
8. Ricochet
9 ... do not remember already .. =))
Fires ships .. couple-more
.. but .. cloud layers in the border.
10. Napalm burns beautifully
About 40 of reworked effects. + About 10 fundamentally new.
Logged

Eexhaton

  • Ancient Entity
  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 865
  • Bukakke Blitzkrieg!
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2010, 07:38:10 AM »

I've got a few very specific questions on this FX revolution mod.
The video does look very good - although I dislike that long bright light when an explosion happens.

Not to bash you guys, but:
1: Is this compatible with HG&P's FX mods?

2: Does it also look good on normal graphics installs? (not desaturated colors?)

3: Is this historical or semi-historical?

4: What is the FPS hit on low-end systems? Will it look/work just as good on older computers?

:)
Logged

New Kle Ahr

  • I got nuked!
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 120
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2010, 09:25:21 AM »

To the last point I can say it don't need much or any fps on old systems.

NewK
Logged

George Formby of the AVG

  • Retired Grunt
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 99
  • Retired Grunt
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2010, 10:01:04 AM »

I have HG&P's FX mods and it runs beautifully with em. As far as historical, with any exhaust producing engine you do get a lil more smoke when ya kick in the "4 barrel", so I am saying it would be close to the realistic scale if anything, also my fps has not been changed in the least.
Logged

X-Raptor

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 238
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2010, 11:01:26 AM »

So we can activate HG&P Uranium + This new one at the same time? does we have to put into MODS folder or better into U.P. JSMEMODS folder?
Logged

SAS~Csocso

  • Aviator Mod Team
  • SAS Honourable Member
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 363
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2010, 01:28:04 PM »

Great effects mod, but please could you make an ATI friendly version please?
I have the same stuttering and stuff that i had with HG&P before they made a version for ATI users!
Logged

SAS~Malone

  • flying as #46 with the FAC
  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14562
  • proud member of that 'other' site
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2010, 02:37:51 PM »

Aed, would you mind making a separate thread for this FX mod? It's interesting enough to be quiite distracting from the original mod, so that we don't lose focus in this thread....thanx, man!  8)
Logged
.....taking fun seriously since 1968.....  8)

Aed

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
  • FX_revolutioner
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2010, 05:06:31 PM »

I think i have no rights to create threads.. cause i don't see button "new thread" anywhere =((
Logged

SAS~CirX

  • R.I.P.
  • SAS Honourable Member
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5254
  • No Zips, Only Buttons
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2010, 05:08:08 PM »

I think i have no rights to create threads.. cause i don't see button "new thread" anywhere =((

fixed ;)
Logged

Aed

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
  • FX_revolutioner
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2010, 05:08:28 PM »

OH! 0_0 Someone created thread.. thanx, Admins..
Whating your comments here! =))
Thanx for fix =)

I've got a few very specific questions on this FX revolution mod.
The video does look very good - although I dislike that long bright light when an explosion happens.

Not to bash you guys, but:
1: Is this compatible with HG&P's FX mods?

2: Does it also look good on normal graphics installs? (not desaturated colors?)

3: Is this historical or semi-historical?

4: What is the FPS hit on low-end systems? Will it look/work just as good on older computers?

:)

1. No, shure.. it complirly replace tham
2. Yes.. but FPS and clumping troubles sometimes becomes.. (we tested ths mod on P4, 2GB, GeForce6600- the weakest PC we got)
3, It is semy historical, i think.. Better say.. Semi-Hist-semi gun cam... for intreteiment +))
4. On low PC we'v got 50 FPS befor FX gang... and 10 FPS if you fly throught smokes of firing village
Logged

Aed

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 36
  • FX_revolutioner
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2010, 05:16:16 PM »

Great effects mod, but please could you make an ATI friendly version please?
I have the same stuttering and stuff that i had with HG&P before they made a version for ATI users!
OK. can you be pleased to discribe problems with ATI... ?
Logged

New Kle Ahr

  • I got nuked!
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 120
Re: FX_revolution
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2010, 07:34:27 PM »

[...]
4: What is the FPS hit on low-end systems? Will it look/work just as good on older computers?

:)
I'm sorry, posted answer into a totally wrong thread!

NewK
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 17   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 26 queries.