Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js

Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: A quick thanks  (Read 944 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Daceon

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
A quick thanks
« on: March 07, 2016, 11:37:59 AM »

Hi There,

I've taken the plunge, bought a beginner's HOTAS, and downloaded WAW. I'm really enjoying it so much, even though I'm still more dangerous to anyone working on the airfield that I am to the enemy :-D

I'd just like to say a thank - you for all of the dedicated work that you guys have done - I can't wait to be able to fly a spitfire properly!

Is there one of the Spitfire versions you would recommend for a beginner?

Pete
Logged

SAS~Malone

  • flying as #46 with the FAC
  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14562
  • proud member of that 'other' site
Re: A quick thanks
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2016, 12:12:18 PM »

hi, and welcome!

Quote
Is there one of the Spitfire versions you would recommend for a beginner?

yes - the Hurricane!  :D
lol, jokes aside, i seldom fly the Spits as i'm a Hurricane nut, but for overall performance the Spits should be way better than the Hurris, in general - there are so many variants you'll spend a lot of time in them, i'm sure, but i can't say which is best for a beginner....
no doubt someone will be along to advise you more soon ;)
Logged
.....taking fun seriously since 1968.....  8)

DougW60

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 219
Re: A quick thanks
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2016, 02:32:34 PM »

Daceon

I don't fly the Spit much either but I find myself flying an aircraft based on the time period and location I find interesting. I started flying the Spifire Mk VIII in Asia because that was what I was interested in.  I do find myself flying the Mk VIII the most because of its use in SE Asia, but I also enjoy the historical aspect of it.  It is the final development of the Merlin engine models and its airframe led to the griffon engine models. 

From a historical point of view: the Spitfire Mk V was the first Spitfire to be able to handle negative Gs without the engine cutting out due to fuel not getting to the engine, so this may be an option. And then there is the Mk IX which is a Mk V airframe with a more powerful Merlin engine.  All of these would make a fine intro to the Spitfire.  After flying one or all of these, going to the griffon engine marks should be rather simple.  That does not mean easy as you will develop habits when flying.  These habits should be okay when you transition from merlin engine to merlin engine marks but these habits will cause problems when you transition to the griffon engine. Example, the griffon engine rotates the propeller in the opposite direction compared to the merlin engine.  I don't remember which but I think the merlin rotations clockwise and the griffon rotates counter-clockwise. I have read pilot bios who almost lost control of their griffon engine aircraft during take-off because of their merlin engine experience.

Anyway, fly what interests you, you will master the Spitfire with time.
Logged

Airbourne

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Nil Desperandum
Re: A quick thanks
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2016, 02:22:22 AM »

More Mark V spitfires were built than any other model. Its problem is that it generally was a slightly worse performer than contemporary German aircraft. The Mark IX is a big step forward and generally a slightly better performer than contemporary Germans. The Mark I and II are only armed with machine guns and have the negative G mentioned above so I avoid them unless flying the Battle of Britain when there is no escape from them. Late war Spitfires, like all late war fighters, use speed rather than manoeuvrability, which doesn't suit my flying style. All Spitfires are easy to fly but not so easy to land.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 22 queries.