Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 12   Go Down

Author Topic: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku  (Read 29309 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

KingTiger503

  • Legendary History Luftwaffe Elite Ace ,,,
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1994
  • KT503 Elite
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #24 on: June 10, 2019, 10:30:45 PM »

It’s Project Z Bomber as CRP with 6 powerful Nakajima Ha-54 36 cylinder Air cooled Piston engines with 5.000 Hp, Before Fugaku, and Second one is Fugaku with 4 Propeller blade with 6 engines, with 2.500 HP with Nakajima NK11A, 18-cylinder.


It was Part of the Project Z,


Best Regards KT503
Logged
My Greatest and Best Regards KT503

sosezi

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 554
  • Bombers ~ Old flying Buckets is my Love!
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #25 on: June 11, 2019, 12:13:39 AM »

We're waiting for the Big Banzai! :) and some great Skinpacks ;) for Luftwaffe as well lol :D :D :D
Logged

denko9001

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 116
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #26 on: June 11, 2019, 02:22:05 AM »

It’s Project Z Bomber as CRP with 6 powerful Nakajima Ha-54 36 cylinder Air cooled Piston engines with 5.000 Hp, Before Fugaku, and Second one is Fugaku with 4 Propeller blade with 6 engines, with 2.500 HP with Nakajima NK11A, 18-cylinder.


It was Part of the Project Z,


Best Regards KT503
I’ve seen concept art of a six engine version with contra propellers. Basically a Japanese b36
Logged

sosezi

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 554
  • Bombers ~ Old flying Buckets is my Love!
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #27 on: June 11, 2019, 02:40:42 AM »

Well, It is ;)
Logged

KingTiger503

  • Legendary History Luftwaffe Elite Ace ,,,
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1994
  • KT503 Elite
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #28 on: June 22, 2019, 04:10:01 AM »

How many Weapons Loadouts they Made, for Fugaku or Project Z on 2 Versions,

Thanks.


Best Regards KT503
Logged
My Greatest and Best Regards KT503

Robyfongaro

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #29 on: June 23, 2019, 09:52:37 AM »

On a book that i have it sais either 5.000 kg with 19.400 km range or 20.000 kg with 6.750 km range.
Logged

denko9001

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 116
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #30 on: June 24, 2019, 05:27:35 AM »

Would that be Japanese secret projects 1 by Edwin Dyer?
Logged

Robyfongaro

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #31 on: June 24, 2019, 07:56:06 AM »

It doesn't really say it, because if it is, it's the Italian version and it doesn't say it. There are some pictures below with the pages of the G10N









Logged

sosezi

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 554
  • Bombers ~ Old flying Buckets is my Love!
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #32 on: June 24, 2019, 10:18:39 AM »

Feels like Japanese Ta-400 :D :D :D
Logged

KingTiger503

  • Legendary History Luftwaffe Elite Ace ,,,
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1994
  • KT503 Elite
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #33 on: June 24, 2019, 07:38:30 PM »

some Japanese Bomber has Lack of Long Range, only G10N only Reaches it’s Target.


Best Regards KT503
Logged
My Greatest and Best Regards KT503

Geschirr

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 831
  • "A plan is a list of things that won't happen."
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #34 on: June 24, 2019, 08:51:27 PM »

Can't wait for it to have its own slot and/or be included in the next BAT update.
*fingers crossed  :-|
Logged
"If we don't know what we're doing, neither will the enemy."

sosezi

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 554
  • Bombers ~ Old flying Buckets is my Love!
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #35 on: June 25, 2019, 02:42:46 AM »

4.12.2 people also waiting as well as 4.09 ;)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 12   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 27 queries.