Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js

Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 187 188 189 [190] 191 192 193 ... 195   Go Down

Author Topic: VP Modpack Discussion  (Read 78929 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Epervier

  • 4.09 Guardian Angel !
  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9596
  • I'm French and Rebel_409! Nobody is perfect!
    • Some tinkering here
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2268 on: October 27, 2020, 02:14:30 PM »
In this case do some research on the forum!
Search button... "black water" !
There are a lot of answers like this...  https://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,63748.msg701982.html
Logged
If your results do not live up to your expectations, tell yourself that the great oak was once an acorn too. - Lao Zi -

Ship_Rek

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2269 on: October 27, 2020, 08:05:12 PM »
Sorry. I'll do more searches.
Logged

astexe

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2270 on: February 13, 2021, 08:05:10 AM »
When I playing the Luftwaffe Defence Of Reich campaign ,i found the game dont have some FW-190s such as FW-190 A7 and some alies planes such as P-38 L-5 LO so i cant continue. would u like to tell me how to solve that
Logged

Flamer50

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 520
  • 'Tracers work both ways.'
    • photobucket.com
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2271 on: February 13, 2021, 01:33:12 PM »
Logged
'The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.'

Toobone

  • Mapper
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 566
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2272 on: February 15, 2021, 04:52:06 AM »
Solved
Logged

astexe

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2273 on: February 16, 2021, 05:34:49 AM »
emm i did everything he said(include rewrite the inis and so on...) but the 00_Fw190 Pack_Claymore_4.12_v2.1 always CTD when i start the mission.the P-38 family is works well
Logged

rogeroger

  • Missioneer
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 473
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2274 on: April 06, 2021, 03:02:34 AM »
 I usually prefer a custom mod install to big modpacks, though I would definitely download this modpack if there was a ww1 addon. Any chance of a ww1 addon in the future.
Logged

SAS~Storebror

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24050
  • Taking a timeout
    • STFU
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2275 on: April 06, 2021, 04:09:01 AM »
BAT -> DOF.
Logged
Don't split your mentality without thinking twice.

rogeroger

  • Missioneer
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 473
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2276 on: April 06, 2021, 11:13:17 AM »
Quote
BAT -> DOF.

Nah! too bluidy big. :)
Logged

SAS~Storebror

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24050
  • Taking a timeout
    • STFU
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2277 on: April 06, 2021, 11:21:01 PM »
That's what she said, but standards remain standards :P

]cheers[
Mike
Logged
Don't split your mentality without thinking twice.

rogeroger

  • Missioneer
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 473
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2278 on: April 07, 2021, 01:41:22 AM »
;D

The last megapack I used was Tfm4.12 which reduced my performance to stutters, so I am a bit wary of these. I enjoy missions with realistically large formations so I end up editing existing missions to achieve this. Megapacks on my present system don't favour this arrangement.  I am sure I am missing out on some great content though, WW1 addon...sigh ;) ;D

Logged

Vampire_pilot

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8630
Re: VP Modpack Discussion
« Reply #2279 on: April 07, 2021, 07:29:03 AM »
Quote from: rogeroger on April 07, 2021, 01:41:22 AM
The last megapack I used was Tfm4.12 which reduced my performance to stutters, so I am a bit wary of these.

Then BAT is exactly for you!
You are basing this on long long outdated experience. BAT performs better and faster on any given system, despite its "size", than any previous "stacked" modpack (VP, TFM, DBW...). The java in BAT is streamlined to performance without any of the old drawbacks of too many mods slowing down everything.
Every plane in BAT gets a java treatment before it is integrated for Storebror's Java Wall FixTM


Quote
I enjoy missions with realistically large formations so I end up editing existing missions to achieve this. Megapacks on my present system don't favour this arrangement.  I am sure I am missing out on some great content though, WW1 addon...sigh ;) ;D

Get BAT, seriously.
The only thing that BAT really needs is harddrive space for size, but in operation it won't come more efficient than this.
I dare predict, a VPModpack out of the Box might be harder on resources than a full clean BAT WAW.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 187 188 189 [190] 191 192 193 ... 195   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 20 queries.