Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js
Special Aircraft Service
the SAS Hangar => The Lounge => Requests & Ideas => Topic started by: Batbomb on October 18, 2013, 06:13:01 AM
-
I noticed that some important weapons (mainly missiles) from the Vietnam-War-Era are either missing or should be revised.
AGM-62 Walleye
(http://www.voodoo-world.cz/hornet/u/agm62.jpg)
A television guided bomb.
Warhead: 825 Ib
Weight: 1,100 Ibs
Range: 16 miles
The Walleye was actually no rocket, but a bomb.
The pilot had to lock on to the target. After that the weapon worked autonomously.
Blueprint
(http://img-new.cgtrader.com/items/3647/agm-62_walleye_3d_model_deea774b-c8fc-483e-aab2-396fcae7c64c.png)
Paveway
(http://data3.primeportal.net/hangar/bill_spidle2/gbu-1/images/gbu-1_4_of_9.jpg)
Paveways where laser guided bombs.
The Vietnam war version was based on a Mk 84, M117 or MK 82. They where used since 1968.
Weight: 650 Ib
Blueprint
(http://de.valka.cz/attachments/121/GBU-12_Paveway_I.jpg)
AIM-4 Falcon
(http://www.f-106deltadart.com/weapons/hughes_aim4-4.jpg)
The first operational Air to Air Missile of the USAF. It is also known as the worst missile of the Vietnam war
Lengh: 6 ft 6 in
Diameter: 6.4 in
Warhead: 7.5 Ib
Propellant: Solid Fuel
Speed: Mach 3
Guidance: Semi active radar homing and rear aspect infrared homing
range: 6 miles
Blueprint:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/AIM-4A_and_AIM-4G_missile_line_drawings.jpg/300px-AIM-4A_and_AIM-4G_missile_line_drawings.jpg)
AGM-45 Shrike
(http://historywarsweapons.com/wp-content/uploads/image/AGM-45_Shrike.JPG)
The Shrike is an anti-radar missile. It was used for wild weasel operations.
lengh: 10 ft
diameter: 8 in
Weight: 390 Ib
Speed: Mach 2
Range: 11-17 km
Guidance System: Passive Radar Homing
Blueprint
(http://www.aviacionargentina.net/foros/attachment.php?attachmentid=12206&d=1379261528)
AIM-7 Sparrow:
I think the AIM-7 fm should be revised. It is far too uber. In Vietnam the AIM-7's performance was regarded as bad.
the kill propability of the AIM-7 was less than 10 percent. It was also victim of constant technological failure.
Further reads:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-62.htm
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=991
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app5/paveway-1.html
http://de.valka.cz/viewtopic.php/t/31120
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-45_Shrike
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-45.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-7_Sparrow
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/aim-7.htm
-
Didn't they call the Aim-7 Sparrow the "great white hope?" I heard some where that it got that nickname because you just "hoped" it would work.... And pilots eventually started rippling off a couple of them... Hoping at least one would actually track and hit.
-
Didn't they call the Aim-7 Sparrow the "great white hope?" I heard some where that it got that nickname because you just "hoped" it would work.... And pilots eventually started rippling off a couple of them... Hoping at least one would actually track and hit.
True story, many accounts tell of pilots ripple firing AIM-7s, the missile its self had like a 30% kill ratio on the best of days.
In addition some of the pilots say that the early version has an extremely visible smoke trail and that alone would scare the early MiGs They didn't have radar warning or wasn't effective in the MiG-17, and 19s
So they saw the smoke trails and broke formation to avoid the missiles whether they were actually the target or not. allowing the F-4 to seperate them and pick them off with the slightly more reliable AIM-9s
When the MiG-21 came out things changed a bit.
-
it's true. the AIM-7 is almost guaranteed to hit in IL-2. The only missile that is realistically unreliable is the AIM-9B, which misses some of the time.