Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8   Go Down

Author Topic: Bachem Ba 349 Natter  (Read 33775 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

moorkey

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
  • One man, one fan, four deafening pillars of power!
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #48 on: February 07, 2012, 11:09:49 AM »
How do I integrate all the different lods into one file?
Logged

ModdingMonkey

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 289
  • Testing, Always
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #49 on: February 07, 2012, 11:59:29 AM »
is that not a model that was downloaded?
I believe I have one on those on my HD as well.
Logged

SAS~GJE52

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5176
  • Orchard Studios
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #50 on: February 07, 2012, 03:01:11 PM »
Quote
is that not a model that was downloaded?
Not that it matters if the original author is credited but I thought the same as well when I saw it. I was sure I had seen that slightly unique mesh layout before somewhere.
Logged
Do not criticise a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes...  Then you can call him what you like, as you have his shoes ... and he is a mile away......

moorkey

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
  • One man, one fan, four deafening pillars of power!
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #51 on: February 07, 2012, 03:50:52 PM »
This is my model. I created it first in fsds v3, then converted it to 3ds format using CVA and Deep Exploration (still not 100% with 3ds, so I do this to migrate slowly)



I once asked someone for help, and I am increasingly sure this file caused the aforementioned flame war. Where did you download it? AAA? Be assured. THIS is the original.

(The extra polygon subdivisions occur upon conversion).
Logged

SAS~GJE52

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5176
  • Orchard Studios
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #52 on: February 07, 2012, 04:44:34 PM »
Ah sorry I must have sen this image of your model before somewhere, I have not downloaded it.
Logged
Do not criticise a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes...  Then you can call him what you like, as you have his shoes ... and he is a mile away......

Gumpy

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1649
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #53 on: February 07, 2012, 04:58:26 PM »
Posted this in a thread awhile ago. It sure would look good in the game.
Logged

moorkey

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
  • One man, one fan, four deafening pillars of power!
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #54 on: February 08, 2012, 01:08:12 AM »
Nice! I'm hoping so. So far as I know it (correct me if I'm wrong) but the Natter would never have had national markings, nor harkenkreuze, as it was classed as an expendable weapon, not an aircraft...
Logged

moorkey

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
  • One man, one fan, four deafening pillars of power!
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #55 on: February 09, 2012, 03:08:54 AM »
The '349 as it stands - D0_00 practically done.

Logged

moorkey

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
  • One man, one fan, four deafening pillars of power!
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #56 on: February 09, 2012, 10:48:21 AM »
Has anyone got pictures of the SG-119 cannon that the 349 was trial-fitted with?
Logged

RooMan296

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 365
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #57 on: February 09, 2012, 03:06:51 PM »
Oohhhhhhh! FINALLY! This is looking great. Lots of people (especially me!) have waited a long time to see this bird in the game.
Thanks for undertaking it.
Logged

CWMV

  • Kalashnikov connoisseur
  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2706
  • A free people ought to be armed and disciplined.
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #58 on: February 09, 2012, 07:20:17 PM »
 :o
That is all.
Logged

Bee

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 414
Re: Bachem Ba 349 Natter
« Reply #59 on: February 10, 2012, 01:59:21 AM »
The Lerche we should have had with 1946.  I'd very much like to see this in-game one day.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 26 queries.