Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[SAS~Anto]

Yep, they were already 1.42 The only extras I can imagine us going on are having separate Bf-109G-2 1.3/1.42 and G-4 1.3/1.42.

[FANATIC MODDER]

Yes, I tried them again and again (the G-6 1.42s). I believe this is realistic as it can be. This is shown by the results of the virtual dogfights. The planes that get them in real trouble are P-51s above 6000m and Yak-3s below 3.000m. But I still wonder about the G-2 1.3. It's indeed slower (and with a lower rate of climb....) that the F-4 1.13 and the revised F-2 that we had in UP 2.01 and this doesn't make much sense.

....I hope they don't cut something in the next DBW release.

[JG54Spookie]

Has anyone else had the E-7 fail to show the trop filter on desert maps? The E-4 works fine, but not the -7.
Otherwise, does anyone know which class file controls the trop filters for the E-4? (I'd almost rather disable the "automatic" trop filters and just go back to the separate Emil trop slots)

[BaronFel181]

We never had a vanilla E-7 with a trop filter. Had an E-7/N trop. Try the E-7/N on a desert map and you should have the trop filter show up.

[JG54Spookie]

We never had a vanilla E-7 with a trop filter. Had an E-7/N trop. Try the E-7/N on a desert map and you should have the trop filter show up.

Oops!    Upon inspection, I see you're entirely correct!

Is this historically accurate, though? Were there no E-7/trop variants that had the DB-601Aa fitted (only 601N)?

[BaronFel181]

I can't say for sure whether or not there were any 601A E-7 trops, but I would be very surprised if there weren't any. I wish I knew how many Emils were eventually fitted with 601Ns, but it seems that there weren't all that many. 112 Emils with 601Ns as of January 1941. I think it's likely that 601A powered Emils outnumbered those with 601Ns.

http://kurfurst.org/Engine/DB60x/DB601_datasheets_N.html

[JG54Spookie]

Interesting data, baron. Thanks for sharing

[mikejr]

Hi guys,

I have posted this in tech help but thought I might get a better response here. 

I've recently installed a few 190 mods, the He-111Z flyable and the Do-217K-1 (see image for #SAS folder). I cannot remember installing anything else since before this problem might have started occurring - it's only now that I've noticed it though. I run '46 4.10.1 with the latest SAS modact and latest buttons.

Basically I selected the 109G-10 Erla in the QMB advanced select menu where you view the aircraft and select load-outs and such and nothing was displayed. Just a blank blue screen. All weapons options etc. appeared normal. Went to fly and I can't use the aircraft at all. I've had this issue with a 190 before (the D-9 late new tail mod) and I just moved the folder to the top of the #SAS directory and that solved it. No such luck here. 

I've checked for class file conflicts and nothing there either. Apart from ignoring it (which I don't want - I love this brilliant 109 pack) I'm stuck.   

These are my installed mods:


Any pointers would be great guys.

Many thanks in advance,

Michael   

[mikejr]

Not to worry guys, THINK I might have solved it. I'll let you know if I haven't. Think something was corrupt in the 3do folder so just copied the relevant folders from a fresh download. 

And can I just remind you how much I love this pack? Cool. The 109 is one of my favourite planes ever, and this really does do it justice. 

Michael. 

[CWMV]

Would it be possible to slow the deployment of flaps?
Lowering the flaps in the 109 took a bit longer than we have here. I realize that this is a very, VERY minor point but hey, why not?
 

[Whiskey_Sierra_972]

Hi Anto!

Hope to don't bother but since I have read new source about 109 and 190 fighter bomber I came back to out old discussion about give 4 digit code at them or not!

I have send you the book I got by PM and I have open a discussion about code into the Claymore 190 pack tread https://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,20351.msg223508.html#msg223508

I don't continue here to avoid confusion and dispersion and eventally I'll open a new topic if the discussion 'll became positive!!

All the best!

walter

[mikejr]

Hi all,

Not to be a nuisance keep posting "problems" with this mod on this post (if only to make the brilliant 109 mod even better), I have noticed an issue regarding the wing guns with the F-2/U Galland, don't know if it's been raised before and/or solved but please see the end of this post/my post here.

Cheers.