Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Engine durability & structural integrity after combat damage  (Read 4872 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mabroc

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 21
Re: Engine durability & structural integrity after combat damage
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2011, 05:12:35 PM »

Bumpity BUMP
Logged

Silverback

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 146
Re: Engine durability & structural integrity after combat damage
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2011, 06:32:06 PM »

No doubt the P-39 and it's varants are the hardest of the red airplanes to kill the engines on (except the radials). But on the outher hand I have never been able to stop a a DB series or Jumo engine instantly with a single burst like a P-40 or P-51. Just a thought.
Logged

Schwieger

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 322
Re: Engine durability & structural integrity after combat damage
« Reply #14 on: October 04, 2011, 02:30:27 PM »

Well, I've seen Lavochkins survive direct hits in the engine full salvo from the weapons on the Bf-109Z... Unfortunately insane engine strength isn't limited solely to the P-39/63s...
Logged

Mabroc

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 21
Re: Engine durability & structural integrity after combat damage
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2011, 02:48:20 PM »

The DB and Jumo engines cook very quickly when damaged, if the engine is smoking it dies in 3 or 4 minutes (depends on the power setting), if you are leaking it start to overheat pretty quickly at combat power and dies in 5m top, only going to cruise power give you more time to escape, but in no way you can pull the crazy stunts the P-39/63 does at full power when leaking or even smoking.

Very few times I got a engine instantly stop with the dead prop, but it happens, sometimes I saw hits then a high pitch from the RPM controller going out of control and the engine seized. The radial engines can survive hits and still work for long times, giving less power off course (less pistons working) if you are not  loosing much oil or fuel (usually the fw190 get the fuel lines leaking on the cowling and even when the engine still works you loss all your fuel in 3m). Sometimes I noticed hits on La-5 cowling (little bullet holes) and no leaking whatsoever but that could be right or error on the damage decal.

There are several DM errors on the planes, a structural weakening MOD by damage limiting the maximum G stress allowed would fix for example when you put 1 or 2 MK108 shells in a P-51 wing or P-47 mid fuselage (did that yesterday) and the damn plane keep fighting, turning, diving at full combat power. Only showing some holes on the skin instead of breaking the plane. The now very limited G stress will only allow for a escape run, if the plane keep tryng to fight, it should break right there. So the errors on the DM would now be atoned at least in a simple and broader way. No need to check and fix every f%&%ckĀ·$ing plane DM.
Logged

Mabroc

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 21
Re: Engine durability & structural integrity after combat damage
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2012, 03:55:38 PM »

bump
Logged

GerritJ9

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 337
Re: Engine durability & structural integrity after combat damage
« Reply #17 on: April 29, 2012, 03:13:16 AM »

1C also got the Ki.61 wrong with regard to oil tank location, they simply duplicated that of the 109.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 25 queries.