Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Yeager_1946]

Is this compatible with DBW 1.7?

Yes. Download this version for DBW 1.71:

https://www.mediafire.com/?a55u65050ooyt57

[Whiskey_Sierra_972]

There is a conflict with one class file of AI mod incorporated in DBW 1.71, so some undesired things can happen.



santobr.

Any news about....I'm just in the building of the effect and I'm a little stopped by this....

?

[santobr]

Any news about....I'm just in the building of the effect and I'm a little stopped by this....

?

Well, Sanka is back, I think he will make a new version soon.

santobr- which download is it, the new one or the old one?
thanks for all the help, guys. every player is different. im different because im the most stubborn pain in the ass yet. lol

The new one.



santobr.

[Whiskey_Sierra_972]

Hi Santobr!

Apologize if my post seemed a bump!!

In reality I was replying to the post above mine....#255....

[santobr]

Don't worry, we are all friends here.



santobr.

[NS~mati140]

OK, I checked on myself and this seems to be incompatible with AI, Engines, Hotkeys & carriers and/or JetWar 1.2 and, as a result, DBW 1.71 wich contains it. I noticed that when I try to dump fuel on one of the jets with Plutonium installed, game crashes. I can post log if you want, but I think its really easy to reproduce.

Also, if latest AI, Eng, HK & Car version 2.5 and/or latest western's CTO mod is installed, the game doesn't start at all with Plutonium Enebled - it crashes at 0% without even crating log.

[santobr]

It's impossible to make one version to each mod that conflicts with Plutonium and another to each new DBW version, that's why we need it included in DBW.
Plutonium is the base to new effects mods, this is another reason too.



santobr.

[OberstDanjeje]

It's impossible to make one version to each mod that conflicts with Plutonium and another to each new DBW version, that's why we need it included in DBW.
Plutonium is the base to new effects mods, this is another reason too.



santobr.

agreed with you

[NS~mati140]

I agree as well, Plutonium has set new standards of visual effects in IL-2. I can't understand the arguments like 'effects mods should be left to player's taste' or 'some may prefer stock effects' because they make no sense - stock effects look like vomit, and most of currently available effects mods are based on Plutonium, so if Plutonium is incompatible we're left with stock crap. We need this in DBW badly.

btw, new fuel drop and jet exhaust effects would be nice improvements to this mod I think.

[CWMV]

Because the effects can cause issues for those running on lesser machines.
Not me, my PC is a beast, but not everyone has had the fortune that we have had to afford top shelf hardware.
Besides, effects really are a personal thing. Just look at any effects thread at how many people object to this, want to change that etc.
you think the stock effects look like poo, well good for you that's your opinion. Some like them.
No reason to force a matter of taste on everyone.

[crazyflak]

This is NOT the DBW request thread, btw

I don't agree with ALWAYS waiting for the people with PCs of +8 years old. We are supposed to be looking for greater looks. Do we dump cockpit repaints and map texturizing because of them? no. So effects carefully studied for fps (as plutonium) shouldn't be exception. Certain things should be standard and then people can neutralize or change specific things they "don't like". Also I have to say that people is waaaaaay too spoiled -not you, but I know some cases ("I don't like this" "I don't like that"....pffff they can play stock if they wish)

[Semor]

+100
Well said