Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 7   Go Down

Author Topic: Lockheed C-130 Hercules  (Read 29923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

coenoo1

  • Cookie
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 226
  • Your whisky geek
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #12 on: March 23, 2012, 12:16:09 PM »

I think the gunship is least important, and the tanker role is most important..
Logged

BT~Tarik

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1521
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2012, 03:17:37 PM »

I think the gunship is least important, and the tanker role is most important..

True, now with the Phantom even more.

Not to sound like a party breaker or something, but if someone stops working on something to take another project up, then it doesnt give a very good impression...(not meant to be offensive, just what I feel).
But dont stop hoping for this one, there have been so much surprises in the last months..
Logged

dotmatrix

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
  • Some of us were never meant to fly...
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #14 on: April 10, 2012, 07:23:20 AM »

https://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,24829.0.html
I did not realise that this project was underway already. If so I would love to be involved in a joint effort. Eagerly awaitng reply.....
Logged

poudjik

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 40
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #15 on: April 11, 2012, 12:52:21 PM »

Haven't heard from 256th_Killer9876 since last year. Don't let this stop your own project dotmatrix, seems you're in good way to getting things done.

Logged

256th_Killer9876

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 139
  • I'm in a Mustang (Run Jerry!)
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #16 on: April 11, 2012, 02:12:28 PM »

Don't worry I'm still here. I just decided that implementing all of the Avionics would be a challenge so I decided to drop it so I'm glad dotmatrix picked this one up.
Logged

brav6

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
    • Steam
Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #17 on: February 02, 2013, 12:59:18 PM »

We've all heard of it and know something about it. It's probably too much to ask but I guess it doesn't hurt to post. I'll try to be as brief yet specific as possible.
Forgive me if there's a thread on it already, I didn't quite manage to spot it.

Brief info
First introduced in 1957 by Lockheed Martin, it would become the US's high command workhorse for the following decades and now with over 2,300 units active (as of '09) and 9 different variations including air-to-ground support and multi-purpose transport carrier, it marked it's rightful place as the muscle-in-charge for the United States Air Force and 68 other countries replacing the aging WW2 piston engine heavies in it's early days, such as the C-47 Skytrain, during the Korean war. Since it's first assignment with the 453d Troop Carrier Wing at Ardmore Air Force Base, Oklahoma in 1956, the C-130 has served in major conflicts such as Vietnam and Op. Desert Storm as well as other purposes including rescue and humanitarian operations across the globe engraving it's title in aviation history. 

[C-130 in 'Nam]


[Low-alt cargo drop]


[Paratroopers]


[C-130 cockpit]


[Cargo Hold]



General characteristics:
Taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_C-130_Hercules

Code: [Select]
***Crew: 5 (two pilots, navigator, flight engineer and loadmaster)
***Capacity:
C-130E/H/J cargo hold: length, 40 feet (12.31 meters); width, 119 inches (3.12 meters); height, 9 feet (2.74 meters). Rear ramp: length, 123 inches (3.12 meters); width, 119 inches (3.02 meters)
C-130J-30 cargo hold: length, 55 feet (16.9 meters); width, 119 inches (3.12 meters); height, 9 feet (2.74 meters). Rear ramp: length, 123 inches (3.12 meters); width, 119 inches (3.02 meters)
92 passengers or
64 airborne troops or
74 litter patients with 2 medical personnel or
6 pallets or
2–3 Humvees or
2 M113 armored personnel carriers
***Payload: 45,000 lb (20,000 kg)
***Length: 97 ft 9 in (29.8 m)
***Wingspan: 132 ft 7 in (40.4 m)
***Height: 38 ft 3 in (11.6 m)
***Wing area: 1,745 ft² (162.1 m²)
***Empty weight: 75,800 lb (34,400 kg)
***Useful load: 72,000 lb (33,000 kg)
***Max. takeoff weight: 155,000 lb (70,300 kg)
***Powerplant: 4 × Allison T56-A-15 turboprops, 4,590 shp (3,430 kW) each
Performance
***Maximum speed: 320 knots (366 mph, 592 km/h) at 20,000 ft (6,060 m)
***Cruise speed: 292 kn (336 mph, 540 km/h)
***Range: 2,050 nmi (2,360 mi, 3,800 km)
***Service ceiling: 33,000 ft (10,060 m) empty;[57] 23,000 ft (7,077 m) with 42,000 pounds (19,090 kilograms) payload ()
***Rate of climb: 1,830 ft/min (9.3 m/s)
***Takeoff distance: 3,586 ft (1,093 m) at 155,000 lb (70,300 kg) max gross weight;[56] 1,400 ft (427 m) at 80,000 lb (36,300 kg) gross weight

Blueprints







Complete aircraft diagram:(the image is too large to post here so I provided the link)
http://sobchak.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/c130hcutaway.gif


Hope to see it someday!  ;D



   
Logged

SAS~Malone

  • flying as #46 with the FAC
  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14562
  • proud member of that 'other' site
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #18 on: February 02, 2013, 01:22:56 PM »

bring it on, yeah! :D
Logged
.....taking fun seriously since 1968.....  8)

Marsei13(BG)

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
  • Love IK-3 and hate FW-190 :P !
Logged

SAS~Malone

  • flying as #46 with the FAC
  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14562
  • proud member of that 'other' site
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2013, 09:02:32 PM »

i thought so, strange, it didn't appear when i searched... ???
okay, merging.
oh, and Marsei13, it is the job of the admins to be angry if something is incorrectly posted, please do not show your anger to a fellow member, when it's not your place to do so.
leave that to the angry admins. thanx. ;)
Logged
.....taking fun seriously since 1968.....  8)

Fresco23

  • Part-Time Skinner
  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2346
  • F.A.C. #23
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #21 on: February 03, 2013, 12:12:48 AM »

Im not very into the heavies but i would totally fly this one if it gets built!
Logged
cogito, ergo sum armatus

kaxII

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 801
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #22 on: February 03, 2013, 04:10:53 AM »

+1 me want!
Logged

brav6

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
    • Steam
Re: Lockheed C-130 Hercules
« Reply #23 on: February 03, 2013, 06:42:08 AM »

i thought so, strange, it didn't appear when i searched... ???
okay, merging.
oh, and Marsei13, it is the job of the admins to be angry if something is incorrectly posted, please do not show your anger to a fellow member, when it's not your place to do so.
leave that to the angry admins. thanx. ;)

Appreciate the merge up, I didn't find it either after an extensive search. PS. I didn't take Marsei13's post badly, I'm pretty flexible with opinions. Cheers!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 7   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 26 queries.