Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: 109TL-12  (Read 7270 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

.50calBMG

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 260
  • Landing just means stop flying, right?
109TL-12
« on: February 21, 2012, 04:01:55 PM »

The messerschmitt BF-109TL-12 was a unique design, having two Jumo 004 jet engines installed under the wings. Also, the armament was changed to 2X30mm cannon with 100 rounds and 1X20mm cannon with 170 rounds. No major modification was made to the 109K4 designe except the deletion of the piston engine, new armament and nose cowling, tail section taken from the 262, and of course the wing jets and strengthened, forward tricycle landing gear, also from a 262.

Logged

US_GRANT

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 691
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2012, 06:22:07 PM »

Okay .50Cal, You need to go back to the first post in this forum about making reuests for new acft and follow the instructions.
Logged

mcmmielli

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 94
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2012, 06:39:50 PM »

Maybe i can give one little help:  ;)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Bf109TL_3Seiten.jpg



The Messerschmitt 109 Turbo-Lader Strahltriebwerk ( turbocharger jet engine) was proposed on January 22, 1943 at an RLM conference as a back-up for the Me 262, of which only three prototypes had been completed at the time. In order to cut down on design and production time, various components from existing aircraft was to be used. The fuselage from the Me 155B high-altitude fighter was to be used (with a new nose and tail section), the wing was from the Me 409 project and the undercarriage came from the Me 309. The armament was to be two MG 151/20 20mm cannon (120 rounds each) and two MK 103 30mm cannon, all in the nose. A later proposal included two MK 108 30mm cannon could be installed in the wing roots. The performance was estimated to be better than the Me 262 due to the Me 109 TL's narrower fuselage. Following intensive study, by March 1943 it was decided that so many modifications to the various components would be needed that no time would be gained over the Me 262 development, thus the project was abandoned.

Span: 12.55m, 41ft. 2in.

Length: 9.5m, 31ft. 2in.

Height: 2.9m, 9ft 6in.

Estimated maximum speed: 980kph, 600mph

Cruising Speed: 840kph, 521mph

Landing speed: 160kph, 99mph

Weight empty: 3070kg, 6754lbs.

Weight loaded: 4750kg, 10450lbs.

http://www.luft46.com/mess/me109tl.html



Nice  1946 request and maybe can be used BF-109Z cockpit whit some changes...
Logged

.50calBMG

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 260
  • Landing just means stop flying, right?
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2012, 07:03:47 PM »

Yeah, I know. Bad post. I was really rushed when I did it because of homework so, sorry guys.
Logged

Schwieger

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 322
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2012, 07:57:03 PM »

Ah, a plane that outperforms the -262 :)
Logged

The_Jester

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 333
  • Mobilis in Mobili
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2012, 07:59:32 PM »

Just about every other German Jet outperforms the 262 in one way or another...
Logged

Schwieger

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 322
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2012, 08:05:20 PM »

Not entirely true.
Logged

The_Jester

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 333
  • Mobilis in Mobili
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2012, 08:15:09 PM »

The Horton doesn't count. It's absurd and survivability goes out the window when the engine fails.
Logged

SAS~Malone

  • flying as #46 with the FAC
  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14562
  • proud member of that 'other' site
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #8 on: February 22, 2012, 12:39:10 AM »

i'm normally opposed to requests for prototype planes, but something about this one seems really cool who knows, maybe some modder will get a bit creative and do something like this. :D
Logged
.....taking fun seriously since 1968.....  8)

RealDarko

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2266
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2012, 06:13:01 AM »

Will really love to see this one. Hope a modder can create it. Look like a perfect candidate to frankenplane.
Logged

BT~Tarik

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1521
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2012, 11:33:02 AM »

outperforming the 262 ? With straight wings ? I highly doubt...
LOL 980 Kmh seems a little too fast no ? After all it is still the 109's body, which would surely break up at those speeds (go take it in a dive from 10K meters and see at what speed it happens :P).
Logged

RealDarko

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2266
Re: 109TL-12
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2012, 01:47:55 PM »

outperforming the 262 ? With straight wings ? I highly doubt...
LOL 980 Kmh seems a little too fast no ? After all it is still the 109's body, which would surely break up at those speeds (go take it in a dive from 10K meters and see at what speed it happens :P).

109 body?? IIRC The 109TL planned to use the MBV155 high alt fuselage.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 26 queries.