Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Short Stirling  (Read 23432 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

radko1111

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 244
Logged

Thunda

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2012, 01:48:07 PM »

@radko111: That is a really beautiful 3d model- probably way too many polys for IL2, and as many of the modders here have reminded us, even when the model is imported into the game, that's just the start of things, but we can dream, can't we?

@HundertzehnGustav: sorry mate, can't understand if you're trying to make a joke?

Logged

Korrigan

  • SAS Honourable Member
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 785
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2012, 02:14:01 PM »

Very good request for another missing WWII british aircraft.  ;)
Logged

HundertzehnGustav

  • Banned on Sep 11/2012
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3402
  • Arrogant Narcisistic Pussy
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2012, 02:24:23 PM »

Nope, thunda, i was just reacting to a post that tried to argue wether the stirling is beautiful or not.
Someone somewhere said something along the lines of "if you think the stirling is ugly, you are blind as a bat"

I just think statements like that are completely useless in a technical description like this and offend even me... i wear glasses and still think she has got one fugly face, you know.
So am i still blind as a Bat? And if so... can i not make the distinction between ugly and beautiful? Do i need to take a closer look at my Girlfriend? Does this mean she is ugly? do YOU mean to say i chose an ugly Girl as a Girldfriend?

Uh... Dangerous. ;)

we had a "ugly Bomber" request some time ago... and guess who was named pretty early in the competition.
We could argue about this all day long...

Lets keep it to the Rivets, cylinders and Data. <<--- that is what i meant to say with my last post.

:)
Logged

HundertzehnGustav

  • Banned on Sep 11/2012
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3402
  • Arrogant Narcisistic Pussy
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #16 on: March 25, 2012, 02:36:36 PM »

:)) :)) :))
*applause*
One more reason for a Stirling!
Logged

F22-Raptor-2006

  • Aviator Mod Team
  • SAS Honourable Member
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1855
    • Aviator Mod Team
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #17 on: March 26, 2012, 03:23:30 AM »

You can talk to csocso about it, but the short stirling model in il2 spec is complete for at least LOD0 and I think it's mapped or was partially mapped. As a team we decided to basically discontinue the project due to the amount of work involved, see how long it's taken the MiG-21? The Stirling doesn't require jet stuff but being much bigger and complex in other ways will take it's time too. We haven't talked about this for a very long time but if there is someone who wants to take it up and put her into IL2 then I suggest you send csocso a pm and talk to him about it.
Logged

Thunda

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 466
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #18 on: March 26, 2012, 05:37:16 AM »

Right, I see, HundertzehnGustav. Well in that case lets take this to PM and discuss it like grown ups instead of ramming opinions down everyone elses throats. Thats not what I said or meant, and you (I hope!) know that.

You are really not one to be telling other people that they are rude, HunderzehnGustav.........
Logged

HundertzehnGustav

  • Banned on Sep 11/2012
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3402
  • Arrogant Narcisistic Pussy
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #19 on: March 26, 2012, 05:49:43 AM »

No i am not.
Still, i just did.
check the PM.

back to the Stirling.
Logged

Schwieger

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 322
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #20 on: March 26, 2012, 06:04:56 AM »

...see how long it's taken the MiG-21? The Stirling doesn't require jet stuff but being much bigger and complex in other ways will take it's time too...

As I've said before, the time it takes to finish should not scare anyone away from making the plane - all the more reason to get on it right away.  Many of us would gladly wait however long it takes for a chance to fly this bird.
Logged

slipper

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 920
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #21 on: March 26, 2012, 08:22:26 AM »

+ 10000 from me  :)

I posted some info, links and books here a while ago in the requests forum, if anyone is interested.

https://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,17947.msg192726.html#msg192726

here's hoping

regards

slipper
Logged

radko1111

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 244
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2012, 02:25:09 PM »


Logged

baronbutcher

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 247
  • Lost in space and in time!
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2012, 01:53:11 AM »

Great request of a lovely aircraft - more RAF bombers the better!  :)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 24 queries.