Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[EIiteLEGEND]

SUBJECT:CHINOOK

IMAGES:




_{General characteristics
Crew: 3 (pilot, copilot, flight engineer)
Capacity:
33–55 troops or
24 litters and 3 attendants or
28,000 lb (12,700 kg) cargo
Length: 98 ft 10 in (30.1 m)
Rotor diameter: 60 ft 0 in (18.3 m)
Height: 18 ft 11 in (5.7 m)
Disc area: 5,600 ft2 (2,800 ft2 per rotor disc) (260 m2)
Empty weight: 23,400 lb (10,185 kg)
Loaded weight: 26,680 lb (12,100 kg)
Max. takeoff weight: 50,000 lb (22,680 kg)
Powerplant: 2 × Lycoming T55-GA-712 turboshaft, 3,750 hp (2,796 kW) each
Performance
Maximum speed: 170 knots (196 mph, 315 km/h)
Cruise speed: 130 kt (149 mph, 240 km/h)
Range: 400 nmi (450 mi, 741 km)
Ferry range: 1,216 nmi (1,400 mi, 2,252 km[88])
Service ceiling: 18,500 ft (5,640 m)
Rate of climb: 1,522 ft/min (10.1 m/s)
Disc loading: 9.5 lb/ft2 (47 kg/m2)
Power/mass: 0.28 hp/lb (460 W/kg)
Armament
up to 3 pintle mounted medium machine guns (1 on loading ramp and 2 at shoulder windows), generally 7.62 mm (0.308 in) M240/FN MAG machine guns
Avionics
Rockwell CAAS (MH-47G/CH-47F)}

 

[radko1111]

OMG sorry for the profanity but when you are interested in an aircraft of this type so you buy LOCK-ON

[Kazegami]

You can't pilot helicopters in Lock-On.

[HundertzehnGustav]

Then DCS black shark or FSX...

[Fryslanboy]

At least not here..

[(-battlemaster-)]

well I is an proper request, so you have to respect it.
Leave the modders with there coise to make it or not
annyway IFF it goos in to production, I know loots will download it.

looking forward

[NS~mati140]

OMG sorry for the profanity but when you are interested in an aircraft of this type so you buy LOCK-ON

Then DCS black shark or FSX...

You know, get the hell OUT OF SAS if you are going to cry about post-war jets and helis in IL-2.

Look at the aircraft section: Jet War, F-4 Phantom, Dragonfly and Chicksaw helicopters - you see we trolled you, this site doesn't accept any "If you want jets and helis go Lock-ON" shit, go to AAS if you want to cry that SAS destroyed IL-2. Period.

There are no retrictions about moding subjects here, let modders say if the have time for it or not.

[mojojojo]

OMG sorry for the profanity but when you are interested in an aircraft of this type so you buy LOCK-ON

Then DCS black shark or FSX...

You know, get the hell OUT OF SAS if you are going to cry about post-war jets and helis in IL-2.

Look at the aircraft section: Jet War, F-4 Phantom, Dragonfly and Chicksaw helicopters - you see we trolled you, this site doesn't accept any "If you want jets and helis go Lock-ON" shit, go to AAS if you want to cry that SAS destroyed IL-2. Period.

There are no retrictions about moding subjects here, let modders say if the have time for it or not.

@mati140: while i agree with your point mati, i disagree with the way you expressed it.
it seems like you could have avoided saying stuff such as "get the hell out of SAS" and "go to AAS if you want to cry that SAS destroyed il2".
seriously, try to calm down.
@radko111: modders are welcome to make any aircraft they want. if you are not interested in these aircraft, simply dont install them.
@EliteLEGEND: i love the chinook, but it seems a little advanced right now. not trying to be mean, but many of the modern aircraft requested by you would already be out if modding was as easy as you thought it was.

[Killer Ghost]

I like it but would rather see a huey first.

[NS~mati140]

OMG sorry for the profanity but when you are interested in an aircraft of this type so you buy LOCK-ON

Then DCS black shark or FSX...

You know, get the hell OUT OF SAS if you are going to cry about post-war jets and helis in IL-2.

Look at the aircraft section: Jet War, F-4 Phantom, Dragonfly and Chicksaw helicopters - you see we trolled you, this site doesn't accept any "If you want jets and helis go Lock-ON" shit, go to AAS if you want to cry that SAS destroyed IL-2. Period.

There are no retrictions about moding subjects here, let modders say if the have time for it or not.

@mati140: while i agree with your point mati, i disagree with the way you expressed it.
it seems like you could have avoided saying stuff such as "get the hell out of SAS" and "go to AAS if you want to cry that SAS destroyed il2".
seriously, try to calm down.
@radko111: modders are welcome to make any aircraft they want. if you are not interested in these aircraft, simply dont install them.
@EliteLEGEND: i love the chinook, but it seems a little advanced right now. not trying to be mean, but many of the modern aircraft requested by you would already be out if modding was as easy as you thought it was.

Yea, sorry for that, but they hit the sensitive point. I was on AAA forums way before SAS came, and I was already flying mainly 1946 jets then. Every thread which came up with something innovative quickly turned into "burn the which thread" and if you ask e.g. Cirx you'll know that was one of the main reasons of creating SAS - to give modders freedom. As a result the entire SAS turned into something unbelievably epic - a simulation of technological progress in the history of aviation. At the moment we are aproaching Vietnam Era. And sudenly, out of the blue come some people who find it unbearable that some people are creative, think creative, and make creative mods.

On the other hand you're right - while chinook is incredibly essencial for Vietnam War Era, it would be better if somehting less complicated would be created first - like, as KG said, Huey.

[mojojojo]

OMG sorry for the profanity but when you are interested in an aircraft of this type so you buy LOCK-ON

Then DCS black shark or FSX...

You know, get the hell OUT OF SAS if you are going to cry about post-war jets and helis in IL-2.

Look at the aircraft section: Jet War, F-4 Phantom, Dragonfly and Chicksaw helicopters - you see we trolled you, this site doesn't accept any "If you want jets and helis go Lock-ON" shit, go to AAS if you want to cry that SAS destroyed IL-2. Period.

There are no retrictions about moding subjects here, let modders say if the have time for it or not.

@mati140: while i agree with your point mati, i disagree with the way you expressed it.
it seems like you could have avoided saying stuff such as "get the hell out of SAS" and "go to AAS if you want to cry that SAS destroyed il2".
seriously, try to calm down.
@radko111: modders are welcome to make any aircraft they want. if you are not interested in these aircraft, simply dont install them.
@EliteLEGEND: i love the chinook, but it seems a little advanced right now. not trying to be mean, but many of the modern aircraft requested by you would already be out if modding was as easy as you thought it was.

Yea, sorry for that, but they hit the sensitive point. I was on AAA forums way before SAS came, and I was already flying mainly 1946 jets then. Every thread which came up with something innovative quickly turned into "burn the which thread" and if you ask e.g. Cirx you'll know that was one of the main reasons of creating SAS - to give modders freedom. As a result the entire SAS turned into something unbelievably epic - a simulation of technological progress in the history of aviation. At the moment we are aproaching Vietnam Era. And sudenly, out of the blue come some people who find it unbearable that some people are creative, think creative, and make creative mods.

On the other hand you're right - while chinook is incredibly essencial for Vietnam War Era, it would be better if somehting less complicated would be created first - like, as KG said, Huey.

i dont think radko111 finds it "unbearable".
i PMed him about this sort of thing a while ago. he probably wont do it again.

[pierre118]

If you don't want to have the chinook on il2, you just have to don't download  it, that's all