Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Grumman G-21 Goose  (Read 28802 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mojojojo

  • the only guy who uses the wildcat in multiplayer
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1368
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2012, 07:01:50 AM »
thats a nice model, radko.
Logged
i7 4790K quad core 4.4GHz/8GB DDR3-1600/ASUS Z87-A/ EVGA GTX 970 4GB/128GB A-Data SSD+1TB HDD/EVGA 650w 80+ gold PSU/ NZXT Source 530 gaming case

barrett_g

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 470
  • Jug Lover
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2012, 08:35:01 AM »
Looks good!  Is that your model?
Logged

barrett_g

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 470
  • Jug Lover
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2012, 02:32:11 PM »


Any modders are welcome to model any of the ladies in this "load out"!!!
Logged

HundertzehnGustav

  • Banned on Sep 11/2012
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3402
  • Arrogant Narcisistic Pussy
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #15 on: April 30, 2012, 03:03:35 PM »
defnitely not his model, and defnitely not anywhere near the polycount we are able to use...
Logged

barrett_g

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 470
  • Jug Lover
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #16 on: April 30, 2012, 03:31:09 PM »
Too bad someone could rip one outta Microsoft flight sim or some such game and convert it... But I'm no modder... It's probably harder than that!
Logged

Kazegami

  • target
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 725
  • Everyone is dumb, but some are dumber than others
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #17 on: April 30, 2012, 05:01:19 PM »
Quote from: barrett_g on April 30, 2012, 03:31:09 PM
Too bad someone could rip one outta Microsoft flight sim or some such game and convert it... But I'm no modder... It's probably harder than that!

Imagine how many planes we would have if we could do that :-\
Yeah, it is harder.
Logged
DFTBA

Kopfdorfer

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2194
  • PULVERIZER
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #18 on: April 30, 2012, 05:32:42 PM »
She ain't pretty but she sure is beautiful!

                                                        This model might need a few more polys!
                                                       

                                                         And in the office....
                                                         
                                                         
                           
                                                         Looking Aft
                                                         

3 View  (WITH Cross Sections!!!)


                                                          Spending time with friends
                                                         

                                                          Nice USN Scheme
                                                         


                                                         Just a swingin'
                                                       


Anyhow ; it's a lovely aircraft.


Kopfdorfer
Logged

352nd_Hoss

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 961
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #19 on: April 30, 2012, 05:51:22 PM »
Flown this on in FSX, really fun, nice cockpit too.
Logged

tooslow

  • Stang Driver
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 329
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #20 on: April 30, 2012, 08:18:56 PM »
I'm not trying to Hijack this thread, but Tecnico66 asked "...i remember there was a similar plane with in-line engines...." 

Here's my attempt to answer his question ...

The in-line engined plane was the "little brother" of the Goose called the Grumman G-44 Widgeon or J4F in Navy service.   Smaller all around and powered by two 200HP Ranger inline engines.





This plane could also carry a 200lb. Depth Charge. With this depth charge in place the plane was flown a crew of two and was said to have a "negative rate of climb" on one engine ... which some thought would keep it from being employed as a patrol aircraft.  Try telling that to the crew of the U-166 which was sunk in 1942 by a J4F-1 just off the Mississippi Delta in the Gulf of Mexico. 





And finally the specifications for the G-44 a.k.a. J4F and the G-21 Goose

   

Enjoy ...TS
 
Logged

Tecnico66

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 126
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #21 on: April 30, 2012, 10:45:58 PM »
Quote from: tooslow on April 30, 2012, 08:18:56 PM
I'm not trying to Hijack this thread, but Tecnico66 asked "...i remember there was a similar plane with in-line engines...." 

Here's my attempt to answer his question ...

The in-line engined plane was the "little brother" of the Goose called the Grumman G-44 Widgeon or J4F in Navy service.   Smaller all around and powered by two 200HP Ranger inline engines.


..ok,thank you....browsing in my memory and.....it would be "Gosling"?
Logged

Oscarito

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 642
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #22 on: May 01, 2012, 12:42:44 AM »




:D :D :D
"De Plane! De Plane!"

Logged
v4.12+MA 5.3 - Win 7

gterl

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
Re: Grumman G-21 Goose
« Reply #23 on: May 03, 2012, 04:20:52 AM »
...we NEEED a Goose  :)

mhhhm imagine dodging those Zero's with one of these ?



Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 24 queries.