Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: A-3 Skywarrior  (Read 12989 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kazegami

  • target
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 725
  • Everyone is dumb, but some are dumber than others
Re: A-3 Skywarrior
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2012, 02:13:59 PM »
MOJOJOJO, it is not modern, it is from the 1950's, but was used until the 90's.
Logged
DFTBA

mojojojo

  • the only guy who uses the wildcat in multiplayer
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1368
Re: A-3 Skywarrior
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2012, 02:18:52 PM »
Quote from: Kazegami on April 25, 2012, 02:13:59 PM
MOJOJOJO, it is not modern, it is from the 1950's, but was used until the 90's.
i know, but i the avionics on some of the later variants were very sophisticated.
Logged
i7 4790K quad core 4.4GHz/8GB DDR3-1600/ASUS Z87-A/ EVGA GTX 970 4GB/128GB A-Data SSD+1TB HDD/EVGA 650w 80+ gold PSU/ NZXT Source 530 gaming case

Roger Smith

  • "Cast in the name of God, ye not guilty" -Big O Boot up message
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 946
  • HgZ? He's just another Jason Beck
Re: A-3 Skywarrior
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2012, 03:42:01 PM »
Quote from: mojojojo on April 25, 2012, 02:18:52 PM
Quote from: Kazegami on April 25, 2012, 02:13:59 PM
MOJOJOJO, it is not modern, it is from the 1950's, but was used until the 90's.
i know, but i the avionics on some of the later variants were very sophisticated.
Can't be much more complicated than the F-4, and not to mention we have a F-14 in the works too.
Logged

coenoo1

  • Cookie
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 226
  • Your whisky geek
Re: A-3 Skywarrior
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2012, 04:22:46 PM »
Quote from: mojojojo on April 25, 2012, 02:18:52 PM
Quote from: Kazegami on April 25, 2012, 02:13:59 PM
MOJOJOJO, it is not modern, it is from the 1950's, but was used until the 90's.
i know, but i the avionics on some of the later variants were very sophisticated.

Also modern avionics probably wont be implemented in the first versions if it is made. That will be done afterwards. If I looked at the picture it just didn't look too high tech, about as high tech as Sabre gages (for that time ofcourse). Correct me if I'm wrong though
Logged

AG-51_Razor

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 221
    • Air Group 51
Re: A-3 Skywarrior
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2012, 09:09:59 AM »
This would be an awesome addition to the Jet Pack!! Thanks for requesting it!  +1000
Logged

poudjik

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 40
Re: A-3 Skywarrior
« Reply #17 on: May 07, 2012, 03:35:18 PM »
Some more material I found:














Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 26 queries.