Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down

Author Topic: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP  (Read 28750 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

{64s}Takeshi

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #60 on: January 22, 2014, 02:46:26 AM »

Nice G3M video







Logged

CzechTexan

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1400
  • TEXAS, USA
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #61 on: September 21, 2014, 12:56:41 PM »

*BUMP*
Any new additions to the Sino-Japanese War are welcomed.  Planes and objects look great.
Logged

Epervier

  • 4.09 Guardian Angel !
  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9529
  • I'm French and Rebel_409! Nobody is perfect!
    • Some tinkering here
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #62 on: September 21, 2014, 01:11:23 PM »

it's been nine months that the author did not come on the forum!
You hope ?
I...  not!  :-X
Logged
If your results do not live up to your expectations, tell yourself that the great oak was once an acorn too. - Lao Zi -

Cally18

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 143
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #63 on: September 21, 2014, 05:31:11 PM »

it's been nine months that the author did not come on the forum!
You hope ?
I...  not!  :-X


Ahhh but he has probably been busy with this project :D perhaps the wait is worth the effort my friend. :)
Logged

RealDarko

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2262
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #64 on: May 01, 2015, 02:21:29 PM »

I think this is the most important WW2 plane missing right now. Sorry for refloting this but I really miss the Nell for those early Pacific War raids.
Logged

Bee

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 414
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #65 on: May 01, 2015, 07:01:00 PM »

I agree.  I hope the G3M will appear someday.  It's greatly missed. 
Logged

{64s}Takeshi

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #66 on: May 02, 2015, 05:02:49 AM »

+1 !
Logged

RealDarko

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2262
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #67 on: May 02, 2015, 07:14:35 AM »

Wondering If while we wait we can repaint a Do17 and add a couple of Japanese torpedos as a loadout...
Logged

KingTiger503

  • Legendary History Luftwaffe Elite Ace ,,,
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1994
  • KT503 Elite
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #68 on: May 30, 2015, 11:12:24 PM »

the Allies have a Code name on this G3M, Its code name Nell, G3M Nell is a Medium Bomber, it will using the Torpedo and Bombs,

Logged
My Greatest and Best Regards KT503

Griffon_301

  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2199
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #69 on: May 31, 2015, 02:17:48 AM »

Not Neil but Nell! Japanese bombers carried female codenames like Nell, Betty, Peggy, Helen, Lilly etc.
Logged

KingTiger503

  • Legendary History Luftwaffe Elite Ace ,,,
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1994
  • KT503 Elite
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #70 on: May 31, 2015, 02:37:11 AM »

Not Neil but Nell! Japanese bombers carried female codenames like Nell, Betty, Peggy, Helen, Lilly etc.
Are you sure.
Logged
My Greatest and Best Regards KT503

agracier

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3048
    • The Great War in a Different Light
Re: G3M1 Type 11 Scratchbuild WIP
« Reply #71 on: May 31, 2015, 02:41:30 AM »

Not Neil but Nell! Japanese bombers carried female codenames like Nell, Betty, Peggy, Helen, Lilly etc.
Are you sure.

Check out the list with corresponding types:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_Allied_names_for_Japanese_aircraft

The only one that seems out of sequence is the Val - which is a dive bomber. But is Val a male or female name? Both?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 25 queries.