Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: NIAI RK-1  (Read 3291 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mexchiwa

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 542
NIAI RK-1
« on: July 31, 2012, 11:29:09 AM »

OK, a thousand reasons this'll never happen (it never flew, for one thing), but the Russians had some wonderfully strange designs before the war, and this is one of those.  Haven't even seen a picture of it, but thought I'd see what y'all thought of it.

It had telescoping wings (Russian nesting dolls as design inspiration? Or the Gerin V-6E (http://www.airliners.net/photo/G%C3%A9rin-V-6E-Varivol/2010290/L/?)  NIAI earlier flew the LIG-7/RK, a two-seat cabin monoplane which tested the concept.

The RK-I fuselage was of light-alloy semi-monocoque construction with a conventional tail unit. The retractable tail-wheel undercarriage was attached to the fuselage, giving the aircraft a very narrow track, retracting into the fuselage and covered by doors. To reduce drag the engine sat in the nose, under a closely fitting cowling, and cooling radiators sat in ducts either side of the rear fuselage fed by long pipework.
 
The wings of the RK-I were very unusual in having tandem main-planes, used as guide tracks and supports for the hydraulically extending wing sections, which more than doubled the wing area when fully extended. The wings were of light-alloy and steel structure with 30KhGSA steel skins, only the rear wing having flaps and ailerons. Unfortunately for the RK-I Joseph Stalin was very interested in the project and insisted that the most powerful engine then available was used in the aircraft. This was the death-knell for the RK-I as the most powerful engine then available was the M-106 which was, unfortunately, a complete failure, not progressing further than bench testing. Construction of the RK-I was complete by 1940, but the aircraft remained un-flown in the workshop due to the unreliable engine.

From the 3-view, it seems that the wing sections retracted into the fuselage, though this would seem to take up a lot of useful volume.



Code: [Select]
General characteristics
 Crew: 1
 Length: 8.8 m (28 ft 10-1/2 in)
 Wingspan: 8.2 m (26 ft 10-3/4 in)
 Wing area: 11.9 to 28 m2 (128 to 301 ft2)
 Gross weight: 3,100 kg (6,834 lb)
 
Performance
 Maximum speed: 150 km/h (93 mph)
 
Armament
 2 x 20mm ShVAK cannon in the nose.
 2 x 7.62mm ShkKAS machine-guns in the nose.


Obviously, top speed is a typo, think the official estimates were pretty optimistic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIAI_RK-I
Logged

Epervier

  • 4.09 Guardian Angel !
  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9544
  • I'm French and Rebel_409! Nobody is perfect!
    • Some tinkering here
Re: NIAI RK-1
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 12:22:30 PM »

150km/h ?
This request is to be classified in most applications rid... unnecessary.
Logged
If your results do not live up to your expectations, tell yourself that the great oak was once an acorn too. - Lao Zi -

HundertzehnGustav

  • Banned on Sep 11/2012
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3402
  • Arrogant Narcisistic Pussy
Re: NIAI RK-1
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 12:26:07 PM »

nono, the yare stored in the fuselage.
the "endplate" would be flush with the fuselage.
One 20mm bullet through these "wing skins", and they are so deformed, that they can not retract at the necessary moment.
or expane.
Or only on one side. get stuck on the other.

in want it!
for whomever i fly against... that guy has already lost the battle at takeoff.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 26 queries.