Hi
Thanks ALL.
Hi JapCat hope you don't mind my reply but even if I thank you like a modder who you are that improve freely this game for the benefit of all Community , I hope you can think that this little details go to bug problem as this kind of mod alters STANDARD-DEFAULT SKINS USE .
I remember that all Community suffered after the alteration of standard skins with the incoming of your "Zero" series modification in the past year.
We have had the result of a mess and problems for the Skin selection of "Zero" series untill a wellcomed PATCH-TO-RESTORE-STANDARD "ZERO" SKINS has been released to solve the problem.
I know you -NOT INTENTIONALLY- make this and I know your intention is to give us all the best historical fidelity to the shape of the Japan planes, but I think the alteration of so little details is not as important as to LEAVE STANDARD SKINS as they are in default game.
Hope you know this is not a criticism to your work. My best whishes M8.
If you made MODS of A6M, I'd be able to understand my feeling.
It's easy to say and the execution is difficult.
I have checked a 3D model of a lot of IL2.
There was nothing cruel with a model of A6M in it.
The details that mistakes and the shape which isn't right.
The mapping of skin is cruel in particular, and the shape of the main plane is big and different after 11 types, 32 types and 52 types and A6M is an aileron and the one with the just different size of the flap and shape.
But A6M of IL2 was the stupid structure for which all skin mappings of the same 11 type are used.
It was the method to say that I contorted those only correction of a XY coordinate of a UV mapping and adapted myself to it.
I made an effort in order to use original skin in first zero MODS. But when the angle of the main plane of original A6M is also just different, and those are applied originally, a straight figure can be reproduced, and don't cry, lapislazuli trout.
It's also caused that IL2 calls this the model who made the triangle a basis.
All figures of a main plane warp, and you wouldn't be able to reproduce history.
And it was the system which reproduces a canopy frame by a alpha channel by A6M. This may be a suitable method to reproduce a in-depth canopy by a low polygon.
The problem of saying that skin of 1024 doesn't have enough resolution occurs but to reproduce a complicated canopy frame.
Therefore the area which is a canopy frame by skin of A6M The, big, including the percentage, the bad influence, in a main plane and a body and It's the cause to which the resolution of the skin of A6M is reduced big.
I needed many time and trouble in utilization methods study of original skin of A6M. But unfortunately the model of A6M was too severe.
It's an easy judgement, not that skin was changed.
I had no choice with difficulty and judged change in the skin.
It's regrettable that those trouble can't be understood besides MODDA.
The wing and the short gear from which the length is also different by the asymmetry of left and right in other ones.
By all models, the same Oerlikon 20mm canon.
I don't pay my respects to a modeler of A6M of IL2.
Anger is felt to why it's a so cruel model though it's the Japanese most famous bird.
If just saying, it's easy.