Topic: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2 (Read 26169 times)

BravoFxTrt · « **Reply #36 on:** February 13, 2013, 07:09:14 PM »

I have W7, and Iv entered PAM=15 ever since I read about it a few years ago, I guess its a positive thought to do it that way.

SAS~Storebror · « **Reply #37 on:** February 14, 2013, 01:03:35 AM »

Quote from: †IcE eAgLe† on February 13, 2013, 05:19:34 PM

I see a graphics improvement with PAM enabled.

Now that would be a real novelty indeed but: You never know, anything can happen.

Best regards - Mike

Typhoon Ib · « **Reply #38 on:** February 14, 2013, 04:23:57 AM »

I can hear someone snicker.
or is that his neck muscles flexing from the head movement?

SAS~Storebror · « **Reply #39 on:** February 14, 2013, 04:47:31 AM »

As long as PAM doesn't change the smell of your feet I'm willing to believe whatever is reported

Best regards - Mike

Typhoon Ib · « **Reply #40 on:** February 14, 2013, 05:06:56 AM »

Oh, there is a lot ot be believed out there!

Ass Eagle · « **Reply #41 on:** February 14, 2013, 07:57:52 AM »

Hey Gustav.. instead of smarta** remarks, maybe try it and see. If it works fine. If not, fine.
When I said slight, thats exactly what I meant.. slight improvement.

SAS~Storebror · « **Reply #42 on:** February 14, 2013, 08:13:46 AM »

Calm down mates

I don't think 110 wanted to be rude in any way.
As a matter of fact first hand PAM seems to be unrelated to graphics, so a funny comment seems not that far away.
Now one thing's for sure Ice: Whether or not this really works, you got me set on this track now and I'll spend some time to try that too tonight, rest assured

Best regards - Mike

Ass Eagle · « **Reply #43 on:** February 14, 2013, 08:34:12 AM »

Call me crazy, but I think theres a difference.

PAM disabled

PAM enabled

marcost · « **Reply #44 on:** February 14, 2013, 09:03:39 AM »

Ice, I'm already a believer in PAM (84 for my machine)

The second image looks brighter and there is more contrast between the colours. It looks better to me

BravoFxTrt · « **Reply #45 on:** February 16, 2013, 05:21:44 AM »

Ice is there a difference in fps?

RedSpade · « **Reply #46 on:** February 16, 2013, 08:00:19 AM »

I will need to give this a look today, if I can. I'm running an AMD 6 core CPU.

Ass Eagle · « **Reply #47 on:** February 16, 2013, 09:07:01 AM »

Quote from: SAS~BravoFxTrt on February 16, 2013, 05:21:44 AM

Ice is there a difference in fps?

Nope. Still in that 31 fps average range.

Author Topic: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2 (Read 26169 times)

BravoFxTrt

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

SAS~Storebror

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

Typhoon Ib

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

SAS~Storebror

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

Typhoon Ib

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

Ass Eagle

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

SAS~Storebror

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

Ass Eagle

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

marcost

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

BravoFxTrt

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

RedSpade

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2

Ass Eagle

Re: ProcessAffinityMask settings tool - assign CPU Cores to IL-2