Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Panther's Pack  (Read 2389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mcmmielli

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 94
Panther's Pack
« on: February 22, 2013, 10:17:24 AM »

F9F-2s, F9F-3s and F9F-5s served with distinction in the Korean War.
Please is possible make this pack whit:

http://www.millionmonkeytheater.com/F9F.html

F9F-3
Allison J33 powered version produced as insurance against the failure of the J42, 54 built. All converted to J42 power later.







F9F-5
Variant of F9F-4, version with longer fuselage with greater fuel load, powered by Pratt & Whitney J48 engine, 616 built.







Specifications:
Grumman F9F-5 Panther
Dimensions:
Wing span:    38 ft 0 in (11.58 m)
Length:    38 ft 0 in (11.58 m)
Height:    12 ft 3 in (3.73 m)
Wing Area:    250 sq ft (23.23 sq m)
Weights:
Empty:    10,147 lbs (4,602 kg)
Operational Gross:    15,359 lbs (6,966 kg)
Maximum T/O:    18,721 lbs (8,491 kg)
Performance:
Maximum Speed:    604 mph (972 km/hr) @ sea level
Cruising Speed:    481 mph (774 km/hr)
Stall Speed:    131 mph (210 km/hr)
Service Ceiling:    42,800 ft (13,045 m)
Normal Range:    1,300 mi (2,092 km)
Climb Rate:    6,000 ft/min (1,828 m/min)
Powerplant:
Pratt & Whitney J-48-P-6 Turbojet; 7,000 lbs (31.13 kN) max thrust.
Armament:
Four 20 mm M3 cannons with 200 rounds each.
Six 5 in (12.7 cm) rockets. 2,000 lbs (907.20 kg) bombs
Logged

Sleepingdragon

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 499
Re: Panther's Pack
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2013, 11:36:08 AM »

The elongated uprated F9F would be pretty nice, but I gotta ask, WTF is the deal on the shot with the damaged tail pipe? Is that hurricane damage at a museum? I see a WW2 era sub in the background, so Im wondering where this is. Mobile? Inquiring mind (mine) wants to know.

Oh and I hope somebody does consider your idea of an uprated Panther. Im not a modder, but it looks like it would not require too much modification of the current one, if the thrust increase is actually enough to make a bit of a difference. We've got 400 variations of 109s and Spits (some with just a couple of rivets placed differently :P ), so I kinda think this could fit in.  8)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 24 queries.