Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Junkers Ju EF 112  (Read 4514 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

archie1971

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1088
Junkers Ju EF 112
« on: January 13, 2014, 11:03:31 AM »
It looks interesting, just a thought




Logged

Typhoon Ib

  • SAS Enfant terrible
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1632
  • unlock.inc
Re: Junkers Ju EF 112
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2014, 11:37:18 AM »
Crimson skies.
the fuel is where?
Straight wing... small rudder...
but about 4500 Horsepower, right?
Rear engine will suffer from lack of cooling, the pseudo intakes/cooling ring just aft of the rear exhausts will also collect hot exhaust gasses, heating the coolant up even more , rather than cooling it.

Whoever drew that was drunk.
and stoned.
Logged
Collecting dislikes since December '82.

Cally18

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 143
Re: Junkers Ju EF 112
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2014, 01:22:57 PM »
Well ... What if the rudder was bigger, and possibly look to the Bell P-39 for inspiration concerning the overheating? (I agree with you, because taking off would be difficult in the configuration shown...wouldn't the oil boil up on take off because the radiator wouldn't be able to cool it?)

Just thinking out loud :)
Logged

Fresco23

  • Part-Time Skinner
  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2346
  • F.A.C. #23
Re: Junkers Ju EF 112
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2014, 06:00:16 PM »
that looks awesome.....  :o
Logged
cogito, ergo sum armatus

David Prosser

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3859
Re: Junkers Ju EF 112
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2014, 07:51:30 PM »
You sure wouldn't mistake that one for someone else's plane in the hard stand would you?
Logged

Typhoon Ib

  • SAS Enfant terrible
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1632
  • unlock.inc
Re: Junkers Ju EF 112
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2014, 02:13:13 PM »
Quote from: Cally18 on January 13, 2014, 01:22:57 PM
Well ... What if the rudder was bigger, and possibly look to the Bell P-39 for inspiration concerning the overheating? (I agree with you, because taking off would be difficult in the configuration shown...wouldn't the oil boil up on take off because the radiator wouldn't be able to cool it?)

Just thinking out loud :)

the 39 had its radiators in the wing roots and all that. at least it "had" Radiators in places that made them effective.
this one has small Radiator around the back engine, and it is made in a way that it cannot be.. effective.

A lot would need to be changed to make this thing... take off.
rear rads under the wings, 109 style.
a few degrees to lift the outer wing.
a place to store any substantial amount of fuel...
and the ineviteable droptanks, because internal fuiel still will not suffice.
and the rudder.

But as above...
i would not want to have this in my Lolwaffle.
Logged
Collecting dislikes since December '82.

archie1971

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1088
Re: Junkers Ju EF 112
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2014, 12:36:34 AM »
Logged

hoddyman

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 197
Re: Junkers Ju EF 112
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2014, 11:19:17 PM »
I've seen this before on the old "Luft 46" website. Looks like something out of that old "Crimson Skies" game.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 24 queries.