Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 9   Go Down

Author Topic: Update Lockheed Hudson A29  (Read 55422 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

CWatson

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 371
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #36 on: September 03, 2014, 08:40:04 AM »

But... It is regrettable to still see FAB50 while Bomb100lbsE long existed!  ;)

 Not a accident. When I am involved in the creation of a mod I intend to make it work in as many versions of the game as is possible. I also make sure they are "stand alone" and do not require any other mod or pack to function, they should work if they are the only mod in the MODs folder.

The 100lbE bomb is not in my game. I chose FAB50 because that is what many stock planes use for 100lb bombs.

CWatson
Logged

Epervier

  • 4.09 Guardian Angel !
  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9532
  • I'm French and Rebel_409! Nobody is perfect!
    • Some tinkering here
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #37 on: September 03, 2014, 09:30:40 AM »

Yet in this Mod you provide the Class and file of the Mk53 bomb.
You can do the same by providing the Class and file for 100lbsE!  :)

It's just a discussion. This is not a criticism.  ;)
Especially since you are a very rare Modder to provide your mods compatible with multiple versions!
Logged
If your results do not live up to your expectations, tell yourself that the great oak was once an acorn too. - Lao Zi -

hoddyman

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 196
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #38 on: September 03, 2014, 11:53:47 AM »

Thanks for the wonderful plane! I'd like to sees Ventura and Harpoon versions sometime, too. There's a rather hokey movie from the 40's starring James Cagney called "A Yank in the R.A.F." That features lots of Hudsons in action.
Logged

CWatson

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 371
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #39 on: September 03, 2014, 11:55:09 AM »

Yet in this Mod you provide the Class and file of the Mk53 bomb.
You can do the same by providing the Class and file for 100lbsE!  :)

It's just a discussion. This is not a criticism.  ;)
Especially since you are a very rare Modder to provide your mods compatible with multiple versions!

Gabriel,

 No criticism take. :)  Difference between Mk53 and 100lb  is I have no in game depth charge to reference, unlike the FAB in place of 100lbE.

Thanks again,
                    CW
Logged

cgagan

  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5815
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #40 on: September 03, 2014, 12:23:03 PM »

Great addition to the game!  Many thanks to all involved for a splendid job, 8)
Logged

Spider16

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 320
  • Non nobis Domine non nobis sed nomini tuo da glori
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #41 on: September 03, 2014, 01:51:48 PM »

An excellent work of all involved. We were all grateful for the effort in improving IL2. A gap closed.


Cheers

Carlos
Logged

Dreamk

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2017
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #42 on: September 03, 2014, 02:36:14 PM »

Quote
... Difference between Mk53 and 100lb  is I have no in game depth charge to reference, unlike the FAB in place of 100lbE.
:-\
Well, as a matter of fact....there are quite a number of historical depth charges available in the game through the various bombs packs I uploaded in this forum with my SCW and Talvisota mods :
- British (BombGun100lbAS_Mk1, BombGun250lbAS_Mk1 and BombGun250lbDC_Mk3),
- Finnish (BombGunM33Sjunkbomb and BombGunM24Sjunkbomb),
- Russian (BombGunGlubinayaBB1 and BombGunGlubinayaBM1),
- Italian (BombGunIT160Kg_AS)
- and Spanish (BombGunHidrostatica100 and BombGunHidrostatica50)
 ;)

Logged

CWatson

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 371
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #43 on: September 03, 2014, 03:12:11 PM »

Quote
... Difference between Mk53 and 100lb  is I have no in game depth charge to reference, unlike the FAB in place of 100lbE.
:-\
Well, as a matter of fact....there are quite a number of historical depth charges available in the game through the various bombs packs

Various packs,none of which I use, and what I aim to make my mods independent of. :)

Question for DBW users. I have one report of no start up sounds with the Hudsons. Can other DBW users confirm if they do or do not have start up engine sounds?

Thanks again,
                   CW
Logged

btasm

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 414
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #44 on: September 03, 2014, 06:38:13 PM »

Using DBW, tried scramble mission, and I do have startup sounds.
Logged

SAS~Poltava

  • Avid FMB user
  • SAS Honourable Member
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3554
  • Help Ukraine fight
    • Check out my modded campaigns
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #45 on: September 04, 2014, 01:48:35 AM »

I've made a single mission for this beauty: North Sea patrol 1939.

See here: http://www.mission4today.com/index.php?name=Downloads3&file=details&id=2029

It uses CY6's C&C mod, meaning that the mission will not be the same, even if you replay it: the time of day and weather will vary, the opposition as well. You might stumble upon German aircraft or German subs, or the patrol might be completely eventless.

See this as a demo to a Hudson campaign that hopefully will be done soon  :)
Logged
You want to give financial support to a front line Ukraine unit fighting the Russian invaders? Paypal kyivragnarock@gmail.com

Benno

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1129
  • Retired Airline Pilot
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #46 on: September 04, 2014, 03:06:04 AM »

Hi'
Thank you to all involved WHO has filled this gap in IL-2,  KUDO's
Benno :-*
Logged

David Prosser

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3856
Re: Lockheed Hudson A29
« Reply #47 on: September 04, 2014, 03:59:42 AM »

Good; saved me a job then.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 9   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 26 queries.