Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet  (Read 5774 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

P51vsFw190

  • Flying Ass Clown #5/#7
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2056
  • Connoisseur of strange aircraft
Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« on: October 10, 2014, 07:58:00 AM »

I think this would be a very interesting plane to have in the game. I find that even though the game is called IL-2 1946, it doesn't seem to have enough experimental aircraft in it.

The initial idea for the XP-56 was quite radical for 1939. It was to have no horizontal tail, only a small vertical tail, used an experimental engine, and be produced using a novel metal. The aircraft was to be a wing with a small central fuselage added to house the engine and pilot. The hope was that this configuration would have less aerodynamic drag than a conventional airplane.

The idea for this single-seat aircraft originated in 1939 as the Northrop N2B model. It was designed around the Pratt & Whitney liquid-cooled X-1800 engine in a pusher configuration driving contra-rotating propellers. The U.S. Army ordered Northrop to begin design work on 22 June 1940, and after reviewing the design ordered a prototype aircraft on 26 September 1940. Shortly after design work had begun, Pratt & Whitney, however, stopped development of the X-1800. The Pratt & Whitney R-2800 engine was substituted, although it was considered not entirely suitable. Although the new engine was more powerful (2,000 hp vs 1,800 hp) it had a larger diameter and required a larger fuselage to house it. This change delayed the program by five months. It was expected that the new engine would require a 2,000 lb weight increase and cost 14 mph in top speed.[1] Since this tailless design was novel and considered high risk, it was decided to construct a small, lightweight plane of similar configuration for testing called the Model N-1M. In parallel with the design of the XP-56, successful flight trials of the configuration were conducted utilizing this airframe, confirming the basic layout. Two small Lycoming engines powered this aircraft. These trials confirmed the stability of the radical design and, upon review, the Army decided to construct a second prototype, which was ordered on 13 February 1942.[1]

Northrop constructed the XP-56 using magnesium alloy for the airframe and skin, because aluminium was forecast to be in short supply due to wartime demands. At the time there was little experience with magnesium aircraft construction. Because magnesium cannot be easily welded using conventional techniques, Northrop hired Vladimir Pavlecka to develop the heliarc welding technique for magnesium alloy. (Later it was discovered that in the 1920s General Electric had already developed similar techniques.

First engine runs in the aircraft were conducted in late March 1943, but excessive propeller shaft flex caused the engine to fail. Pratt & Whitney did not send another engine until August, causing a five-month delay.

Taxi tests of the XP-56 began in 6 April 1943 and showed a serious yaw problem. At first, it was thought to be caused by uneven wheel brakes, and considerable effort was placed into fixing this problem. Manual hydraulic brakes were installed and the aircraft flew on 30 September 1943 at Muroc Air Base in southern California. Eventually, the yaw problem was traced to a lack of aerodynamic stability, and to fix this the upper vertical stabilizer was enlarged from a mere stub to one much larger.

After a number of flights, the first XP-56 was destroyed 8 October 1943 when the tire on the left gear blew out during a high-speed (~130 mph) taxi across Muroc Dry Lake.

General characteristics

Crew: one, pilot
Length: 27 ft 6 in (8.38 m)
Wingspan: 42 ft 6 in (12.96 m)
Height: 11 ft 0 in (3.35 m)
Wing area: 306 ft² (28.44 m²)
Empty weight: 8,700 lb (3,955 kg)
Loaded weight: 11,350 lb (5,159 kg)
Max. takeoff weight: 12,145 lb (5,520 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Pratt & Whitney R-2800-29 radial, 2,000 hp (1,492 kW)

Performance

Maximum speed: 465 mph at 25,000 ft (749 km/h)
Range: 660 miles (1,063 km)
Service ceiling: 33,000 ft (10,061 m)
Rate of climb: 3,125 ft/min at 15,000 ft (953 m/min)
Wing loading: 37 lb/ft² (181 kg/m²)
Power/mass: 0.18 hp/lb (0.96 kW/kg)

Armament

2 × 20 mm (.79 in) cannons
4 × .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns







Logged
“German humor is no laughing matter”

SAS~Skylla

  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1956
  • Flying Ass Clown N°24
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2014, 08:33:16 AM »

Woha!  ???

Definitely a nice looking model which leads to some interesting "what if" scenarios...  ;)

+1
Logged
When all else fails: read the instructions!

Typhoon Ib

  • SAS Enfant terrible
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1632
  • unlock.inc
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2014, 09:25:57 AM »

Why?
They took ages to get it flying, and when it finally did, it was so short and so unstable, they had a hard time getting the freakin thing off the ground.

And YOU think its a good idea to go hunt Ju-188s with that?
think of it, imagine it in the field, based in england or france...

I mean...?!

[not being against experimental aircraft, northrop did good work and all - but there are reasons this thing was never put in the hands of a regular pilot]
Logged
Collecting dislikes since December '82.

SAS~Skylla

  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1956
  • Flying Ass Clown N°24
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2014, 10:02:19 AM »

sorry I didn't know about that ... calm down ...
Logged
When all else fails: read the instructions!

P51vsFw190

  • Flying Ass Clown #5/#7
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2056
  • Connoisseur of strange aircraft
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2014, 11:16:40 AM »

Seriously, I agree with Skylla.
Logged
“German humor is no laughing matter”

SAS~CirX

  • R.I.P.
  • SAS Honourable Member
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5254
  • No Zips, Only Buttons
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2014, 11:40:21 AM »

Why?
They took ages to get it flying, and when it finally did, it was so short and so unstable, they had a hard time getting the freakin thing off the ground.

And YOU think its a good idea to go hunt Ju-188s with that?
think of it, imagine it in the field, based in england or france...

I mean...?!

[not being against experimental aircraft, northrop did good work and all - but there are reasons this thing was never put in the hands of a regular pilot]

I agree mate, the tone of the reply was a little personal, but I am sure you did not intend it to be so. This was just a request, not an announcement of the direction IL2 modding will be going for the next 5 years :)

And as requests goes, nothing wrong with this one. An entire version of IL2 (1946) was based on including many prototypes and some even wishful dreaming planes that should and could never have been flown, but we always want to give them a go anyway, because they are cool. So this one is not so weird.

I also enjoyed reading the summary that the original poster posted. Interesting stuff. Thanx for sharing it.
Logged

P51vsFw190

  • Flying Ass Clown #5/#7
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2056
  • Connoisseur of strange aircraft
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2014, 11:46:43 AM »

You're welcome
Logged
“German humor is no laughing matter”

VF111Sundowner

  • Virtual Ninja!
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 388
  • Why can't everything be Rocket Propelled!
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2014, 11:47:45 AM »

My question how did the thing rotate for takeoff when it reached V1 and how did it land?
Flaring would be unheard of with that bottom fin practically touching the ground sitting still!
Logged

P51vsFw190

  • Flying Ass Clown #5/#7
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2056
  • Connoisseur of strange aircraft
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2014, 11:49:09 AM »

You ever seen a B-52 take off?
Logged
“German humor is no laughing matter”

VF111Sundowner

  • Virtual Ninja!
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 388
  • Why can't everything be Rocket Propelled!
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2014, 11:56:28 AM »

Yep and there is a huge stabilizer of a difference. between those two.
Logged

P51vsFw190

  • Flying Ass Clown #5/#7
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2056
  • Connoisseur of strange aircraft
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2014, 12:01:40 PM »

True, however, there is enough lift in that wing to make it rise without the need for pulling the yoke back.
Logged
“German humor is no laughing matter”

P51vsFw190

  • Flying Ass Clown #5/#7
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2056
  • Connoisseur of strange aircraft
Re: Northrop XP-65 Black Bullet
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2014, 12:02:34 PM »

If you're going fast enough that is.
Logged
“German humor is no laughing matter”
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 28 queries.