Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: A Few Maps for Consideration  (Read 4153 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kopfdorfer

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2164
  • PULVERIZER
A Few Maps for Consideration
« on: February 24, 2015, 09:38:11 AM »

Hey Guys,

               Since there is no Map request section in the Map area , I thought I'd post this here.
               If this violates any protocol please remove or redistribute as required.
               As time goes on there is a more and more complete representation of mods available , and the realm of maps is no exception.
               Because I enjoy IL2 much for the historical representations it offers , and I am interested specific to the WW2 era , I feel there
               are still a couple of key geographic areas worthy of consideration by map makers out there.
               Another priority in terms of what represents a utile map for IL2 ( for me) is heavily influenced by my interest and involvement in
              SEOW (Scorched Earth Online War online cooperative campaigns for IL2). This usage has a few specific requisites for full
              functionality , some of which are not always considered and therefore included in the maps available to IL2.
              Mostly this is in terms of the perfect function of roads , railroads and bridges , but is also affected by mapmakers who
             ( for their own excellent reasons) enjoy creating beautiful heavily populated maps , and also more often by maps whose chosen
             geographic areas sometimes fail to reflect the historical ground and sea war and the necessary supply routes ( and how they
             shaped the air war) by exclusions of important areas beyond the map edges portrayed (sometimes so frustratingly close to the
             edges that it seems inexplicable why they weren't included.
             I make these statements not to raise the ire of the splendid mapmakers out there , but rather to illustrate what some of my criteria
             for map usage are. Further ,  I make no claims to be able to make a map , and must make my contributions to the community in
             other (limited) ways . Publicizing my thoughts is it seems to me the most useful ; even if support my ideas is not shared by others ,
             then at least the publicizing of the thoughts can hopefully direct some modders energy onto a positive path for others.

               I will list my thoughts as they exist in priority for me.
               I will attempt to justify my prioritization .
              Others will of course have differing opinions...

               1) Lorraine - Saar - Vosges
                   My suggested edges of a useful map would be defined as :
                   Vouziers - upper left corner -
                   Mannheim - upper right corner -
                   ~Bar-sur-Aube - lower left corner -
                   Villingen-Schweinnenger - lower right corner
                   Include Merzig - upper centre -
                   Colmar - lower centre -
                   Other towns it would be representational to include Speyer , Heidelberg , Pforzheim , Gambsheim
                   
                   Historically this map is principally useful only for 1944-45 , but it does cover several important subcampaigns.
                   In order to cover the span of all these campaigns , I believe 3 versions would be necessary :
                   a grey wet autumn map , a light snow to represent the shoulder seasons both autumn and spring , and
                   a heavy snow winter map.
                   a. The September 1944 Battles in Lorraine. In fact these gnarly contests stretched into the late fall of '44.
                       Lots of ground-pounding here. Primarily the US 9th Tactical Air Force , and some significant Free French battles.
                       "Lorraine Campaign" is a term used by U.S. Army historians to describe operations of the U.S. Third Army in Lorraine during World War II from September 1 through December 18, 1944. Official U.S. Army campaign names for this period and location are Northern France and Rhineland. The term was popularized by the publication of a volume of the same name by the U.S. Army in 1950. As written by the volume's author:
Precise military terminology has been employed, except in those cases where clarity and economy of style have dictated usage of a more general nature. Thus, the Third Army operations in Lorraine are considered to be a "campaign" in the general sense of the term, despite the fact that the Department of the Army does not award a separate campaign star for these operations.
Although the term Lorraine Campaign is unofficial, it represents a more traditional use of the term "campaign" in that the battles described by the term were part of a larger operation that had a set goal. By contrast, the official U.S. Army campaign names refer to what were actually multiple campaigns and large military organizations with diverse goals.
Operationally, the term encompasses the assaults across the Moselle and Sauer Rivers, the battles of Metz and Nancy, and the push to the German frontier at the onset of December 1944.

The Lorraine Campaign consisted of three phases.
     i.The push to the Moselle
The Third Army, lacking gasoline, was unable to swiftly take both Metz and Nancy, unlike the actions that characterized the rapid advance across France. After the battle of Arracourt following the fall of Nancy and the meeting engagement of Mairy, the Third Army had to pause and await resupply. For the OKW, stopping Patton was a priority that resulted in replacements and reinforcements for the German Fifth Panzer Army and First Army.
     ii.Stalemate around Fortress Metz
Until 12 October 1944 and the beginning of the assault on Metz, exceptionally rainy weather hampered military operations. This combined with spirited German resistance and competent use of the terrain around Metz to delay the fall of Metz until late in November 1944.
     iii.The advance to the Saar and the Siegfried Line
After the fall of Metz and its fortifications, the Third Army launched an offensive to advance to the Westwall. The attack across the Saar River was underway as the Germans opened the Ardennes Offensive. Operations on the Saar were scaled down as Third Army shifted troops north to counterattack the German offensive into Belgium and Luxembourg from the south. The move north of the Third Army marked the close of the Lorraine Campaign.
The 3rd Army sustained 55,182 combat casualties during the Lorraine Campaign (6,657 killed, 36,406 wounded, 12,119 missing).
Exact German losses in Lorraine are unknown, but were suspected to be severe. At least 75,000 German prisoners were captured by the 3rd Army during the offensive.
Offensive operations by the U.S. Army in this part of the Western Front resumed in mid-March 1945 with the objective of occupying the Saar-Palatinate.

                   b. Unternehmen Nordwind , the German subsidiary attack to Wacht am Rhein , carried out through the Vosges mountains in
                       atrocious deep snow conditions.
                       
                   c. The Gambsheim counterattack
                       
                       From "Riviera to the Rhine" :
                       Operation NORDWIND proved only the first in a series of German attacks against the 6th Army Group, which American soldiers dubbed collectively the New Year's Eve offensive. Altogether, between 5 and 25 January, the German Army undertook four additional multidivision offensives against the U.S. Seventh Army and another against the First French Army just above the Colmar Pocket. Although most of these attacks were hastily planned and executed with little finesse, some caught the Americans by surprise, and together they threatened to overwhelm the tired units of the Seventh Army. Having already been greatly weakened by the massive diversion of military supplies and replacements to the Ardennes, Patch's forces somehow had to find the means from their own strength and resources to turn back the multiple German threats.

On 5 January, as Patch began deploying the 103d Division east of the Vosges, Himmler's Army Group Oberrhein began its NORDWIND "supporting" attack."(1) Under the direction of General Otto von dem Bach's XIV SS Corps, the 553d Volksgrenadier Division, reinforced with armor and commando units, spearheaded the main effort, which fell on the right, or eastern, flank of Brooks' VI Corps across the west bank of the Rhine at Gambsheim, just ten miles north of Strasbourg. Two days later, on 7 January, Rasp's Nineteenth Army initiated another attack south of the city near Rhinau, on the northern edge of the Colmar Pocket. Code-named Operation SONNENWENDE ("Winter Solstice"), the southern offensive included attacks by Thumm's LXIV Corps, with the 198th Volksgrenadier Division, the 106th Panzer Brigade, and other armored elements (with forty to fifty heavy tanks and assault guns). The new series of attacks at Rhinau and Gambsheim not only threatened the southern flank and rear of the VI Corps, but also the city of Strasbourg. If Hitler could not take Antwerp in the north, then Himmler was determined to present him with Strasbourg in the south. The two attacks quickly forced Patch to shelve any plans for an offensive by the 103d Division in the Vosges or any expectations of immediate relief from the French in the south.

                   d. The German retreat to the Rhine River ; a continuous series of moving engagements from the Sarre to the Rhine.
                       Elements of this occurred in the Autumn of '44 , but following the defeats of the Ardennes and Nordwind , the Americans
                       drove the Germans east relentlessly in the early spring of '45. ((note : this could conceivably have a map of its own ,
                       situated further east than the one I am proposing here)).

2. Armee Gruppe Nord 1942-43
    We have a map of Leningrad , and we have a brilliant map of Moscow (big thumbs up , Oknevas!), but the historically significant area
    between them remains unrepresented.
    There are many , many battles that can be represented on this map , and some of them are unique in what they offer to the IL2 gallery of
    history.
    In my mind the area this map needs to cover could be as contained as this example , but I would prefer it include some towns further east
    such as Dubno , Klin and Rzhev ( I know Okneva's Battle of Moscow map includes Rzhev, but Rzhev and this region were intrinsically
    linked regarding supply , transferring units, and airbases that were significant for both sides.
    3 Versions to cover weather : Summer , Muddy Autumn , Winter.
   

3. The Invasion of Southern France , Operations Anvil and Dragoon , August 1944.
    This map would also be useful for USAAF strikes from Sardegna and Corsica on targets in Southern France in the Spring of 1944.
    A bonus of this map is that it ties in directly to the south of the Lorraine - Saar - Vosges Map.
   
   
    This Map would ideally go as far north as Lyon and Milan , but if necessary could be trimmed to have the north map edge at Avignon -
    Grenoble - Turin. The map should include both Corsica and Sardegna in total , as well as Menorca.
    I would suggest avoiding Rome simply to save the functionality of the map.
    This is still a pretty big map, and I don't know how doable , given the heavy populating it might require.
   

4. My last map idea for today is the Lower Yangtze River , including Shanghai , and as far upstream as map limitations allow. This would allow for some really interesting campaigns and missions in the 1932-1937 period.
   
   
   

Anyhow I hope these thoughts interest some and may sometime in the future inspire a map maker looking for their next project.

Sincerely,

               Kopfdorfer

Logged

SAS~Gerax

  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4766
Re: A Few Maps for Consideration
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2015, 10:32:52 AM »

Quote
2. Armee Gruppe Nord 1942-43:

https://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,43830.0.html

I am looking forward to this map.  :)
You are right, this would cover a lot of "action" of HG-Nord.
and especially all the activitites of JG54.
Logged
i7-13700K, MSI RTX4090, Kingston 64GB, Asus Z790-P, Crucial SSD 1TB, Kingston SSD 4TB;

Kopfdorfer

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2164
  • PULVERIZER
Re: A Few Maps for Consideration
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2015, 10:40:47 AM »

Thanks Gerax ,

                       I hadn't noticed this thread. Very exciting indeed!

Kopfdorfer
Logged

Uzin

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2816
  • On lifetime holidays
Re: A Few Maps for Consideration
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2015, 12:04:44 PM »

I think that map mapers would be glad to have such support - request similarly detailed as that for planes.
As for SEOW request of strictly functioning roads and bridges, however, there is controversy with historical correctness (limited choice of angles of both bridges and roads in Il2).
Logged

David Prosser

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3857
Re: A Few Maps for Consideration
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2015, 02:00:16 AM »

That first map would cover the area around Verdun wouldn't it? If so, it could be used for WWI too.All round , its a very well done request. I'd like to see all, or any of these maps materialize.

Kopfdorfer

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2164
  • PULVERIZER
Re: A Few Maps for Consideration
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2015, 06:54:02 AM »

Yes David ,

                 Verdun is about 40 km east of Reims , and a hair south , along the main highway Reims - Metz.

Thanks for the support guys , I wasn't sure if this request would sit well or not.

Uzin , I understand that the beauty of the original in-game roads and some other features have been visually advanced by skilled map makers such as yourself , however the SEOW engine and its use in mission plotting in a external interface to the FMB (SE Mission Planner) depends upon AI units (ground and sea  and rail included) moving in relation to the road and rail system and the airbase layouts as the result of movement plotting by player/commanders , and there is to date no successful result in doing this with modified (read here rounded corner) roads. In addition , each time an AI ground unit comes up to a road or rail node with an error , most usually because the sections do not meet properly , it confuses the AI and upsets the movement plots.
The second , and admittedly less significant in the day of more powerful pcs, the heavily populated maps that are now functional are still challenged by SEOW missions which are often more heavily ground movement oriented are still challenging for online coops , which are the purpose of SEOW.
The third thought is regarding map designer added destruction. Generally , maps for SEOW are preferred to have little or no predestruction , as destruction can be added by a campaign designer , but not removed. Though most participants in SEOW start camapaigns in some historical context , it doesn't (ever) take long for player commanders to swerve away from history , and it is a little counter-immersive to have destroyed buildings where the battle has not yet been.
The fourth thought for the maps that prove most useful for SEOW , is to have a border area of territory , be it land or sea , around the area of focus , to allow flanking movement of both armed and supply units . Many wonderful IL2 maps fail in this area (insofar as SEOW is concerned) by having a map end right at a coast , leaving no significant sea corridor to effectively move ships through , or by cutting off the terrain just short of a significant airfield or road or rail junction. Each of these types of areas are significant to SEOW ( because SEOW is limited in how ,  where , and when off map units can be introduced - unlike a single player offline campaign.
I hope my thoughts make sense to those not aware of how SEOW functions , and once again I encourage anyone here at SAS to drop over to SEOWHQ on teamspeak and ask questions. I am a relative beginner over there , and the denizens have proved mostly quite friendly , helpful and encouraging.
Let me say one more thing - because each mission in SEOW is related to the next , the importance of getting your aircraft back to base , whether you succeed in your mission or not , can be as important as the mission itself , and the level of adrenaline when you fly is at an entirely different level when you are flying a campaign where your aircraft's return is important to the NEXT mission.
It's a different kind of rush.

Cheers Guys,
Feedback appreciated.

Kopfdorfer
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 26 queries.