Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[SAS~Storebror]

F-35, no doubt.

[SAS~Ghost129er]

F-35, no doubt.

+1

[Knochenlutscher]

Mrs Lilienthals static Flycatcher

[hamilton_p]

[Mrs Lilienthals static Flycatcher]


No static, but flying... and more like an X-36 than a F-35.

The cropped image shows just the tail and the propeller... it is a pusher! Apparently, the first cruciform tail in aviation history...

H

[hamilton_p]

Oh well, my proposal wasn't very successful apparently.

It was a detail of Alphonse Penaud's Planophore, which, powered by a rubber band, flew a whopping 131 feet streak on 18 August 1871 at the Tuileries Garden in Paris, delighting the members of the Société Aéronautique.

Open house!

[locopiston]

Was too hard Hamilton...  and needs be categorized in drone section 

I go with the plane of Diana Prince before switch invisibility on.
She looks ugly with helmet.




i think is super easy and roll fast.
Cheers!

[mexchiwa]

XF-90?

[locopiston]

Yes Mex!

Superfast!

[mexchiwa]

I had one I wanted to post so I was keeping an eye out...

Anyway, here it is:

[P51vsFw190]

The Lockheed Duo-4 was essentially a Lockheed Vega with two Menasco C-4 Pirate inlines mounted on their sides with the cylinder heads closest together and the shafts farthest apart. It eventually crashed during a test flight in 1931 and was rebuilt with larger more powerful engines. The four cylinder Pirate engines were replaced with six cylinder B6S Buccaneer engines with superchargers that had a power output of 230 hp. It flew again in 1934 and proved to be a successful design. Unfortunately nothing came of this and it was put on the back burner.

[mexchiwa]

I need more info...

Kidding, of course - all yours

[P51vsFw190]

Try this one:





James