Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 ... 12   Go Down

Author Topic: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku  (Read 29226 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SAS~Storebror

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23868
  • Taking a timeout
    • STFU
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #60 on: October 31, 2019, 05:51:18 AM »

Just a sneak preview of what 101tfs & Team are working on...



]cheers[
Mike
Logged
Don't split your mentality without thinking twice.

urmel

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 809
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #61 on: October 31, 2019, 09:44:08 AM »

It looks very good!!!
Regards, Urmel
Logged

Piotrek1

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2339
    • SAS IL BYTES BACK
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #62 on: October 31, 2019, 12:48:29 PM »

Bravo! Beautiful :-*, and of course amazing work 8) :D.

Best regards,
Piotrek
Logged

Mission_bug

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6047
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #63 on: October 31, 2019, 01:06:40 PM »

Now that is a beast, looks superb.  8)


Wishing you all the very best, Pete. ;D
Logged

PO_MAK_249RIP

  • CMON U SPURS!
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2084
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #64 on: November 01, 2019, 10:43:06 PM »

Cant wait!! Longer runway needed me thinks ;D
Logged
Corsair Carbide case, Intel core i5 4690 3.5ghz with Arctic Cooler, Asus Rock H97 performance, MSI Ventus XS OC 1660GTX 6GB DDR6, 32GB Patriot Viper 1600Mhz, 256GB/500GB Crucial SSDs, Windows 10 64bit.

SAS~Storebror

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23868
  • Taking a timeout
    • STFU
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #65 on: November 02, 2019, 01:15:19 AM »

There's been some troubles with the turrets during the past few days, but that's solved now.
Regarding runway length, this in fact has been an issue in the japanese plannings as well.
The japanese considered using RATO pods like the germans did. Maybe the Fugaku will get some, we'll see.
You should note though that in the video shown above, the Fugaku was overloaded, with full bombs load, full gun setup and 100% fuel, and AI was not trained yet to wait pulling up the plane unless it reached rotation speed (that's fixed meanwhile).

]cheers[
Mike
Logged
Don't split your mentality without thinking twice.

KingTiger503

  • Legendary History Luftwaffe Elite Ace ,,,
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1991
  • KT503 Elite
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #66 on: November 02, 2019, 03:24:50 AM »

That G10N CRP has 5.000 HP engine with 6 Blade Propeller, it needs a Longer Runway, but it’s Weight is too heavy because it’s 160.000 Kg at Max Takeoff weight, too Heavy,

But the Project Z (G10N Fugaku) has 2.500 HP Engine with 4 blade Propeller, it can takeoff at 70.000 kg Less weight than 160.000 Kg.


Best Regards KT503
Logged
My Greatest and Best Regards KT503

SAS~Storebror

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23868
  • Taking a timeout
    • STFU
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #67 on: November 02, 2019, 07:57:10 AM »

has
KT you're talking about the plane as if it was real.
It never was.

That G10N CRP
(...)
But the Project Z (G10N Fugaku)
Now you're mixing up things completely.
You're talking about two possible versions of the plane as if the CRP version and Project Z would be two different planes, and as if CRP would not be a Fugaku.
That's wrong.
Without any claim to completeness, I recommend taking a look at this chart:



The plane we're modelling here is kind of a mix between the "Z" models to the left of the chart and the "ultimate Fugaku" to the right.

6 Blade Propeller
(...)
4 blade Propeller
Just two possible versions out of - at least - four.
Our plane will have CRP with 4 blades each, in total 8 blades per engine.

]cheers[
Mike
Logged
Don't split your mentality without thinking twice.

KingTiger503

  • Legendary History Luftwaffe Elite Ace ,,,
  • Supporter
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1991
  • KT503 Elite
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #68 on: November 02, 2019, 08:57:49 AM »

Your right storebror,  I am talking about the Weight of the Fugaku, It’s Way too Heavy for Takeoff, it needs a Longer Runway to Max Power for Takeoff.


Best Regards KT503
Logged
My Greatest and Best Regards KT503

SAS~Storebror

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23868
  • Taking a timeout
    • STFU
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #69 on: November 02, 2019, 10:22:17 AM »

it needs a Longer Runway to Max Power for Takeoff
As seen on the charts, 1-2km should be sufficient.
We'll see. Should work with our existing runways and if not, we can always add rato if need be.

]cheers[
Mike
Logged
Don't split your mentality without thinking twice.

SAS~Storebror

  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23868
  • Taking a timeout
    • STFU
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #70 on: November 06, 2019, 10:02:23 AM »

Let me tease you a bit: Time for a few development screenshots!









]cheers[
Mike
Logged
Don't split your mentality without thinking twice.

SAS~Bombsaway

  • Choose your battles wisely.
  • SAS Team
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9213
  • A day without laughter is a day wasted
Re: Nakajima G10N1 Fugaku
« Reply #71 on: November 06, 2019, 10:07:44 AM »

That looks great Mike. I cant wait to see the final release. :)
Logged
Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 ... 12   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 25 queries.