Special Aircraft Service

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Ju-88 A4 with different bomb & torpedo loadouts, RATO, and defensive X-4.  (Read 24797 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Twister

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
Re: defensive X-4, combined with different bomb loadouts, for Ju-88 A4
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2010, 04:44:58 AM »

I works too now, great job!!!!!!! :D :D :D
Thank God!

just a suggestion for the Fw-200: have you thought of adding torpedo loadouts sometime? or better wait for 4.10 and add both torpedos and the Hs-293 guided bomb  :)
If U give me some info (or link to it) about FW-200 torpedo loadout, I will think about it.
Logged

SAS~Malone

  • flying as #46 with the FAC
  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14562
  • proud member of that 'other' site

to the best of my knowledge, the FW 200 never carried torpedoes. bombs, anti-ship mines, Hs293, and sometimes even a little bloke called Adolf Hitler, but never torpedoes... ;D

Logged
.....taking fun seriously since 1968.....  8)

Mad026

  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 683
  • F.A.C. Tailnumber 26

to the best of my knowledge, the FW 200 never carried torpedoes. bombs, anti-ship mines, Hs293, and sometimes even a little bloke called Adolf Hitler, but never torpedoes... ;D



+1

I read intels about that the germans used the FW-200 above the northern sea against ships, but they never equipped it with torpedos.
Logged

Twister

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296

Looks like it have no appropriate hardpoints for torpedoes.
Logged

StrykVladzimsky

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 235
  • Airship Pirate

I know that this might not be realistic, but wouldn't it be neat to have like 5 rounds of big caliber flak as an armament for some big bombers to blow the crap out of some close bandits? It might not be realistic but I'd bet it would be fun as hell.
Logged

SAS~Malone

  • flying as #46 with the FAC
  • Editor
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14562
  • proud member of that 'other' site

well, it'd probably be loads of fun to have planes with lasers, too, but that doesn't mean it'll happen. at some point, we have to try and balance the fun with realism, or at least, 'what-if' realism.....but,big flak guns on a bomber? can't see it happening, tbh... ;)
most ww2 bombers simply wouldn't be able to carry that kind of extra weight and still have a respectable payload, which would negate the usefulness of the bomber in a big way....there's not much point in having a bomber that can knock anything out of the sky that comes near it, but can't carry much in the way of bombs....that's what they had escort fighters for... :D
Logged
.....taking fun seriously since 1968.....  8)

StrykVladzimsky

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 235
  • Airship Pirate

Well, you're right there. My dad said the same thing. On another note, would simulating big airships be possible?
Logged

Twister

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296

... On another note, would simulating big airships be possible?
Almost anything can be simulated. It's just a question of time, that someone is willing to devote to this hobby.
My biggest dream is a "Akron" or "Mekon" with fighter complement.
Logged

StrykVladzimsky

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 235
  • Airship Pirate

I want a hindenburg, Man that thing was BIG!

Something like this at 1:59

HALU Blazing Angels 2: Secret Missions of WWII PS3 Xbox360 PC Trailer
Logged

Twister

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296

I want a hindenburg, Man that thing was BIG!
Cool. However, the difference with "Akron" & "Mekon" is that this thing is in game, but "Akron" & "Mekon" was real and only airships - aircraft carriers.
BTW, at 0:28, Yak-15 looks like having X4-like homing missiles... Curious, they want to say, that the russkies would copy them, as AIM-9 in reality.
Logged

Verhängnis

  • Unofficial Heinkel Fan
  • Modder
  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1494

Just thinking aswell, wouldn't they be focusing materials on development of Jet fighters?
Logged

panzer1b

  • member
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 69

YOU ARE A GOD


i have been waiting since il2 came out for a 2nd rear gunner, even if it doesn't help out much (mg81 sux anyway), it really made me wonder why ju88 had 1 fake rear gun on it......

i mean real ju88s had 2 top rear gunners (actuially quite alot of gunz on it), and any way to add a 20mm gunpod or something to it? i mean there were configurations adding a 20mm or so into front of plane, for straffing missions

and x4s are cool, finally some 1946 stuff, but if what i saw in game existed in WWII, i am pretty sure the allies would have passed out
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 26 queries.