Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[dsawan]

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/280741-fw-190-tl-focke-wulf-jet-plane-kinda/
https://plane-encyclopedia.com/ww2/focke-wulf-fw-190-strahljager-jet-fighter/
https://www.facebook.com/285618221477939/posts/the-focke-wulf-fw-190-tl-is-now-ready-it-is-a-172-conversion-for-the-tamiya-fw-1/2273008626072212/

Code: [Select]

Specifications (Ta 152 H-1)
Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H.svg

Data from Aircraft of the Third Reich, Volume One[26]

General characteristics

    Crew: 1
    Length: 10.82 m (35 ft 6 in)
    Wingspan: 14.44 m (47 ft 5 in)
    Height: 3.36 m (11 ft 0 in)
    Wing area: 23.5 m2 (253 sq ft)
    Airfoil: root: NACA 23015.3; tip: NACA 23009[27]
    Empty weight: 4,031 kg (8,887 lb)
    Gross weight: 4,727 kg (10,421 lb)
    Max takeoff weight: 5,217 kg (11,502 lb)
    Fuel capacity: 992 l (262 US gal; 218 imp gal)
    Powerplant: 1 × Junkers Jumo 213E or Junkers Jumo 213E-1 V-12 inverted liquid-cooled piston engine, 1,287 kW (1,726 hp) for take-off

            1,530 kW (2,050 hp) for take-off with MW-50 water/methanol injection
            940 kW (1,260 hp) at 10,700 m (35,100 ft) with GM-1 Nitrous Oxide injection

    Propellers: 3-bladed Junkers VS-9 constant-speed propeller

Performance

    Maximum speed: 580 km/h (360 mph, 310 kn) at sea level with MW-50 boost

            759 km/h (472 mph; 410 kn) at 12,500 m (41,000 ft) with GM-1 boost

    Range: 2,000 km (1,200 mi, 1,100 nmi)
    Service ceiling: 15,100 m (49,500 ft) with GM-1 boost
    Rate of climb: 20 m/s (3,900 ft/min) at maximum weight of 5,217 kg (11,502 lb)

            25.4 m/s (83 ft/s) at 4,727 kg (10,421 lb)

    Time to altitude: 10,000 m (33,000 ft) in 10 minutes 6 seconds
    Wing loading: 196.8 kg/m2 (40.3 lb/sq ft)
    Power/mass: 0.276 kW/kg (0.168 hp/lb)

Armament

    1 × 30 mm (1.181 in) MK 108 cannon 85 rds
    2 × 20 mm (0.787 in) MG 151/20 cannon 350 rds

[kirk1965]

Very special request!

[flying_dutchman]

Why are we so obsessed with "what-ifs" rather than improving on "what was" to perfection.

[Timex62]

Hello Dutchman, It really up to who wants to do the work.

[NobleNerd]

Why are we so obsessed with "what-ifs" rather than improving on "what was" to perfection.

Really depends on the what-ifs. I like the believable ones, especially the ones that almost were. In this case, it's almost certainly fictional, or at best horrendously impractical... but man, it looks interesting.

I may be in the minority with loving the what-ifs, but it's one of the main features of the base game as well, so the fact that it's being expanded on with BAT and such is simply marvelous.

[Ruskiwaffle1991]

The real FW 190 jet is something that resembled early turboprop projects like the one used in the 262TPF prototype.

[Venator77]

Why are we so obsessed with "what-ifs" rather than improving on "what was" to perfection.

Because the 1946 part is in the game. Not everything has to be historically accurate.

[bomberkiller]

Why are we so obsessed with "what-ifs"...

Hello flying Dutchman,

bk is on your side!

"What if" is futureless nonsense.

Pushin "what if" into the past is pointless nonsense. Read A. Schopenhauer, E. Kant, A. Einstein...!

Don't we have enough aircrafts in #UP3, #DBW and/ or B.A.T.?

 

Gerhard

[Chaoic16]

Why are we so obsessed with "what-ifs"...

Hello flying Dutchman,

bk is on your side!

"What if" is futureless nonsense.

Pushin "what if" into the past is pointless nonsense. Read A. Schopenhauer, E. Kant, A. Einstein...!

Don't we have enough aircrafts in #UP3, #DBW and/ or B.A.T.?

 

Gerhard

I do not agree with you.   Doing 'what if" is a great way to expand our imagination and see how past would have been different. If we only stay with one linear historical, it becomes boring.

it is an ideal to have both historical and alternative history "What if".  We can enjoy experiencing the past in countless ways virtually.


Cheers!

[DONAGHY]

keep it some what real