So I'm still trying to tie a bunch of details into what I hope is eventually a believable alternate history, but I've run into some serious roadblocks regarding tech. Long story short, events go strangely, and WWII isn't a proper World War until 1946, and even then, it plays out very differently.
In my mind, you'd still have things like the Tiger II and Panther, but it recently hit me like a ton of bricks with the word "duh" carved into each one; if Operation Barbarossa never happened and the Germans never had the chance to encounter T-34s directly until 1946, how would they have the knowledge to build their famous tank designs in time for the later conflict? After all, both the Tiger II and Panther were partially based on the T-34.
And then you have jet engines. Once again, I originally envisioned the Soviets using things like MiG-9s, but again, no Barbarossa, no chance to steal things like Me-262s and thus no reverse-engineered jet engines.
Probably the biggest one: assault rifles. If the Soviets never got their hands on the StG-44, would the AK exist? I pictured the Soviets adopting the AK-46 (an earlier model of AK that was eventually refined into the AK-47) since war would start in 1946, but once again, no Sturmgewehr... no AK?
Where would I go with this? Would the VK 20 tank designs be developed further without the changes in requirements (and probably suck)? Would the Soviets still be trying to get things like motorjets to function properly (and also probably suck)? Do I rely on some vague explanation like espionage and/or defectors taking weapon and aircraft tech with them?
I'm at a loss. I'm getting into territory where I have to make up a little too much, and most of it probably wouldn't be very realistic.