The early tactics (or the lack of it) of the Allies made the difference, rather than the planes. Looked how effective the Buffalos were in the hands of the Finns. They knew to avoid dogfighting with agile opponents and only used only boom and zoom tactics in such cases.
The Allies in the Pacific were pretty naive to start dogfighting the lighter and nimble Japanese fighters. They caught up though..
EXACTLY!!!
I did this stuff , in real life, for 16 years..
As we used to say in the USAF fighter community.. " A hamburger in ANY bun.. is STILL a hamburger!" Meaning that a lousy fighter pilot in the worlds most advance fighter will still lose to a better fighter pilot in an older aircraft.. Better meaning 'smarter'..
US Training and tactics prior to involvement in actual combat still emphasized the turn and burn mentality... which played right into the tactics and strengths of the Japanese.. The reasons for these short comings in tactics and training were many.. Funding, Isolationist mentality, lack of realistic intelligence.. etc. etc..
Additionally, there was a lot of US propaganda to explain the initial losses US forces experienced early in the fight... One MAJOR propaganda claim was we has 'inferior aircraft'...
US pilots fought the Japanese pilots fight... at first.. It did not take long to learn this lesson... its amazing how death motivates people to learn and adapt! Remember. the Attack on Pearl Harbor was in December of 1941..
The AVG in the first months of 1942 applied appropriate tactics and prevailed.. The P-40, that was 'Inferior' continued to maintain a positive kill to loss ratio throughout the war.. once it was 'flown' properly..
The US Navy did the same.. and in June of 1942 the 'Thatch Weave' and other high energy and mutual support tactics/procedures led to victory after victory,, Just six months after Pearl Harbor.. the IJN was soundly defeated at Midway.. and never recovered the offensive..
the USN and USMC wrote history in the skies around Guadalcanal.. with 'Obsolete' and 'inferior' F4F's.. was the F4F as good or better as the A6M? the real answer is it depends on what performance you are comparing.. overall the F4F, while not 'better' by any stretch of the imagination.. it was a pretty fair competitor to the Zero.. It was close enough that the 'Stick actuator' is what made the difference.. When the F4F pilot fought their aircraft correctly.. a zero pilot had his hands full.. The F4F was also to stay in combat operations for the entire duration of the war..
BC