Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Riptide_One]

Epervier,

Thank you very much for this MOD, which I consider a "must have". Your instructions were clear and I had no problems installing it.

I've taken a look at some new planes but not all. I am offering a few comments, not criticisms, solely for the purpose that the might be considered for addition to future refinements of this MOD. Note that I am running UP 2.1:

1) The H19D and HRS3 do not show national markings.
2) The RAF skin for the F4U-1 looks good. However, the code is the same for all copies. There are double, misaligned roundals on the left wing and the fuselage on the USAAF skin. Before I installed your MOD, there were Soviet red stars on top of the American stars. Though not perfect, for me, the new situation is some improvement.
3) When I designate, for example, Polish nationality for the MiG 15 and 17 skins, I get Polish insignias. When I designate USSR, I get North Korean roundals.
4) The P-26 shows up with an American skin regardless of the designated nationality.
5) The Sea Fury skin shows no national markings regardless of the designated nationality.

If this is not the correct forum for a discussion of the foregoing observations, I apologize.

In any case, I am very happy to have this MOD and thanks again!

Cheers,

Riptide

[Epervier]

Thank you!
Unfortunately this mod does not change the "skins". He can not do it!
This mod simply displays the planes with their "skins" by default.
The default skins can be changed in the Mod of the plane, in the "plane" folder and "summer", "winter"...

I hope that google has done a good translation! 

Merci !
Malheureusement ce mod ne permet pas de modifier les "skins". Il ne peut pas le faire !
Ce mod se contente d'afficher les avions avec leur "skins" par défaut.
Les skins par défaut ne peuvent être modifiées que dans le Mod de l'avion, dans le dossier "plane" puis "summer", "winter"...

J'espère que google a fait une bonne traduction !
 

[Riptide_One]

Epervier,

Thanks for your quick response. Yes, I did understand what you said. Actually, I suspected that this might be the case, but I asked the question anyway to be sure.

I think your MOD is great and I thank you once again!

Cheers,

Riptide

[mad_pilot]

Hey Epervier
What is the correct way of installing this mod? I don't have
- Stationary.ini
- Technics.ini
?I am using 4.09m with SAS mod act 2 for clean 4.09m
thank you very much!!!

[Epervier]

Hello,
I do not use the "Mod Act" and I can not find the link for the default files .ini 4.09 !
But by delving into the "Mod actv 2.3" (https://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,8993.0.html) I saw that all files "ini " were present in the archive (\MODS\STD\com\maddox\IL2\objects\).
They should match your needs.

Bonjour,
Je n'utilises pas le "Mod act" et je ne trouve pas le lien pour les fichiers "ini" par défaut du "4.09" !
Mais en fouillant dans le "Mod actv 2.3" (https://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,8993.0.html) j'ai vu que tous les fichiers "ini" étaient présents dans l'archive (\MODS\STD\com\maddox\il2\objects\).
Ils doivent correspondre à vos besoins.

[mad_pilot]

Yes there are 2 object.ini files
one is air.ini [airplanes]
second is static.ini [which contains only static object like houses,ruins.. etc , i mean there aren't static planes there  ]

[Epervier]

See the archive of the ActMod 2.3 !

[mad_pilot]

now working hehe Great JOB!! 
Happy New Year!!!

[Epervier]

I am delighted that everything works! 
Bonne Année ! Happy New Year ! Feliz Año Nuevo !

[Dinosbacsi]

Is this works with 4.10 too?

[SAS~Malone]

Dinos, probably not - as it is in the 4.09 section, as you can see.
i must now ask you kindly to stop asking the same question in every 4.09 thread, and simply try it for yourself and see.
this is now also the last time i am going to ask you this.

[Epervier]

Is this works with 4.10 too?

I do not use the v4.10 !
I have not had time to test it on version "ModAct 2.5"!
If someone has tested it, can give the result?
If the result is negative... I could not do better because I have not managed to extract the "Class" of the 4.10 ! 
However, I planned to put the Do-217 in the next release (see the end of the first message)... always in section 4.09 !